NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07425-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Specialty Leader for Nephrology dated 1 July 2002, a copy of which is attached. evaluation of his hypertension and the protein noted on his urinalysis.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07425-02
Pursuant to the provis filed enclosure (1) with th corrected to cancel a teen1 ,ns of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ,tment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07426-02
At the end of the anniversary year on 19 July 1996, Petitioner was credited with 11 consecutive qualifying years for In the anniversary year ending on 18 July reserve retirement. This can be accomplished by moving one retirement The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the change in the number of qualifying years. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by moving...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07427-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative and,procedures applicable to the proceedings of this regulations Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07428-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that the RE-4 reenlistment code issued on 30 May 1997 be changed to RE-1. As indicated, there is no basis in the Given the circumstances, the Board concludes that The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07438-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction by a special court-martial of an unauthorized absence of about 167 days, a period of more than five...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07439-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07443-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy Board requesting-that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 19 May 1986. filed enclosure (1) with this The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Cooper and Ms. 2. e. Regulations state that individuals who have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07445-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07449-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your request on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07453-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,.considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. differently than others discharged for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07455-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Navy on 2 March 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07455-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07459-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance applicable to the proceedings of this Board, consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board rejected your contention to the effect that the absence of documents...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07459-02
S MEH: ddj Docket No: 7459-02 5 November 2002 DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From To: : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject ’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07460-02
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments CNO memorandum 7220 Ser Subject’s naval record N130C3/02U0599 of 29 October 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of per diem for his billeting for Temporary Duty (TDY) for the period 1 October 2001 through the date he graduated from the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07462-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason At that time you were assigned of misconduct on 19 August 1994. a reenlistment code of RE-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07464-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Your record reflects that you served The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 October 1968 at the age of 18. nearly for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07468-02
Regarding the remaining contested fitness report for 1 November 6 December 1996, Petitioner contends that this report is adverse, but was as it should have been, for the opportunity to make a rebuttal; that the comments and marks are inconsistent; that this report was submitted at the same time as the preceding report at issue, giving him no time to improve; and finally, that this report, in which he was ranked below all six of the other captains compared with him, was an attempt to help the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07470-02
Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in request for By enclosure 3. with a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at en (3), this Headquarters provided Ma Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 1610 MMER/PERB A:JG ?oul ii ; From: Co To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 161O.llC Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board and injustice in your naval Having reviewed all the facts of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07471-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07472-01
You were so discharged on 28 December 1998 and assigned You were advised of your procedural Your desire to reenlist due to recent events is Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of entry level performance and conduct. were treated no differently than others separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07475-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The other Sailor admitted to assaulting a You and another Sailor were charged with On 21 October 1980 the On 3 November 1980 the Chief of Naval Personnel advised the command that it planned to take no separation action on the foregoing matter. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07476-01
Punishment imposed consisted of a suspended On 25 April 1995 you were notified that administrative separation action was being initiated to discharge you under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense. present your case to an administrative discharge board You appeared before an ADB with counsel on 14 August 1995. The found you had committed misconduct due to ADB, by a vote of 3-0, a pattern of misconduct and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07478-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Both the forfeitures and reduction were A 25 March 1992 Court However, the On the A page 9 entry shows that you were assigned adverse marks of 2.6 in military bearing and personal behavior for the reporting period 1 February to 16 October 1992, and you were not recommended for reenlistment. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07478-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additio?, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 3216196 of 10 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07480-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the corrected to establish entitlement to a zone Am rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07483-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 1833. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Kastner, and allegations of error and injustice on 5 November determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07489-02
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Therefore, the Board concluded Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07490-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The On 5 The Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07490-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and McBride, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07492-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone HM rating (NEC 8432). The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07493-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The medical record shows that you However, there is no Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated based on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07496-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. concluded that appropriate action was taken to remove the mark of desertion from your record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07499-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. Staff Sergeant application with supporting documents has been ncerning his request for removal of the sensitive medical documentation contained in his official military personnel files (OMPF). Staff medical documentation contained in his OMPF.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07503-02
As indicated in enclosure Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed the requested correction of Petitioner’s fitness report record. (3), the HQMC office having cognizance PeCltioner’s request to strike his failure of selection for promotion CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the (3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting limited contents of enclosure relief, specifically, removal of Petitioner...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07506-01
Your allegations of error and Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07506-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 3 May 2 0 0 3 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You served for a year without disciplinary incident, but on 3 1 December 1 9 8 1 , you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for dereliction in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07508-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2003. On 14 April 1983 you received NJP for breach of peace and assault and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to paygrade E-2, and a $250 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07509-02
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 7509-02 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07510-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 29 October 2001 and 25 March 2002, copies of which are attached. Based on our review of the material provided, we find the following: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07511-02
are asked to comment on allegations administrative discharge board did not sufficiently deliberate upon their decision against (2) the separation authority did not Petitioner's discharge, properly consider the letter of deficiency, dated 31 May 2001, submitted by Petitioner's counsel, Petitioner's administrative separation board unfairly prejudiced the board's recommendations: restored to duty as an act positive urinalysis is the "only blemish" in an "otherwise exemplary record of service." ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07518-00
he had been granted an honorable discharge by the Department of the Navy, but that this decision was reversed by the Marine Corps. b. Mr. documentation that the patient manifested symptoms of PTSD immediately following his return from Vietnam, and that these symptoms led to the patient's undesirable discharge in 1970. result of the patient's Vietnam combat experiences.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07518-01
At the time of his reenlistment, However, available records During his he had completed nearly six years of active service. The record why Petitioner was assigned an not recommended for retention approval from Commander, Navy contains no explanation as to RE-4 reenlistment code. In June 2000, the HYT limit was changed to 12 At the time of Petitioner's discharge, This means that CONCLUSION: It appears to the Board that Petitioner may have been Upon review and consideration of all the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07521-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07522-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 September 2001, a copy of which is attached. Specifically: (1) The Reviewing Officer concurred with the Reporting Senior's assessment that indicated the petitioner was unsatis- factory. Likewise, the Reviewing Officer Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY SERGEANT E CASE OF USMC b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07524-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07525-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH: ddj Docket No: 15 January 2002 7525-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers (3) Subject ’s naval record 8 11 of 27 November 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07527-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Tew, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...