Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07499-01
Original file (07499-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

BJG
Docket No: 7499-01
18 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated
1 November 2001, a copy of which is attached.

Documentary material considered by the Board

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion.
If you are correct that the contested documentation may harm your
chances to be selected for promotion, this does not warrant removing it. In view of the
above, your application has been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes of the members of the panel

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

Y
HEADGUARTERS  UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

3280 RUSSELL ROAD

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN REPLY REFER TO:
107 0
MIFD
NOV 0

2001

1 

MEMORANDUM FOR

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

SE OF STAFF SERGEANT
USMC

1.
Staff Sergeant
application with supporting
documents has been
ncerning his request for removal
of the sensitive medical documentation contained in his official
military personnel files  

(OMPF).

MC0 

1070.14A,  Official Military Personnel Files  

2.
Contents, sets forth guidance and provides information on the
contents of the OMPF in use at Headquarters, U. S. Marine Corps
(HQMC
or to assist in the mission of HQMC staff agencies are recorded
in the OMPF.

Only information essential to document a Marine's career

(OMPF)

) .

MC0 

P1070.12H,  Marine Corps Individual Records Administration
(IRAM) sets forth guidance and provides information

3.
Manual 
concerning adverse matter and other reports, statements, or
correspondence of a military nature authorized for inclusion in
the OMPF.
material authorized for inclusion in the OMPF.

Certain limitations exist regarding the kinds of

The following comments/opinions concerning the sensitive

4.
medical documentation on file in his OMPF are provided:

a.

Staff 

Sergean

was relieved from recruiting

duty for the good of the service due to a medical condition.
These documents were part of the request by his commander to
support the relief.

b.

A copy of the approved relief for good of the service
1070.14A for

package does meet the guidelines contained  
inclusion in Staff  

Sergean

MC0 

OMPF.

C .

Staff 

Sergean

'was provided the opportunity to

make a rebuttal statement as required by paragraph  
IRAM.

1000.4~  of the

d.

Staff Sergeant

documented evidence enclosed in

his application, BCNR letter 
September 1999,
these documents in his OMPF is in error or unjust.
letter refers to another issue that is irrelevant to the contents
of the OMPF.

does not support his claim that inclusion of

LCC:lc Docket No. 4109-99 dated 28

The BCNR

5 .

In view of the above,

it is recommended that:

OF STAFF 

MC

SERGEAN

The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove

a.
Staff 
medical documentation contained in his OMPF.

Sergea

request for removal of the sensitive

b.
Staff 
was 
documentation contained in his OMPF.

If the Board for Correction of Naval Records finds that
ecords are in error or an injustice
removal of the sensitive medical

Sergea
committe

6.

Point of contact

at

Director
Manpower Management Information
Systems Division

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02641-00

    Original file (02641-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following comments concerning the page 11 entry dated 960112 4. are provided: a. The following comments concerning the page 11 entry dated 980326 5. are provided:' a. he was he statement would be filed acknowledged the counseling " to" make a statement in Again, it is noted that a copy of the rebuttal statement Sergean furthe b. Sergean does not provide documented evidence to support his claim that the page 11 entry is in error or unjust.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04133-01

    Original file (04133-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Copies of RFC documents appearing in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) are at Tab B. removal of the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 17 April 1996, a copy of which is at Tab C, as he says it resulted from the fitness report. He provides his rebuttal of 17 April 1996 to the page 11 entry, and he states that he does not know why it is not in his record. The Board for Correction of Naval Records disapprove request for removal of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03119-01

    Original file (03119-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: SE OF STAFF SERGEAN Staff Sergeant 1. has been reviewed concerning his request for removal of the Administrative Remarks (1070) NAVMC 000714 and CMC letter of selection from the 2000 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board, from his service records. 118(11) page 11 entry dated 1450/5 MMPR-2 dated 22 Aug 2000, revocation application with supporting documents MC0 authorizes commanders to make entries on page...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01

    Original file (03973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06881-99

    Original file (06881-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    They were unable to find how, if at all, his report influenced your nonjudicial punishment or your removal from the 1998 staff sergeant selection list, nor could they find how he changed his opinions following the review of his report by the CO. We reviewed Sergeant documents concerning his Administrative Remarks page 11 entries dated 980804 and 981125, Offenses and Punishment page 12 entry dated 990311 and CMC letter 1450/3 MMPR-2 dated 2. In view of the above, it is recommended...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06143-01

    Original file (06143-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 10 March 1998. Staff Sergean not assigned to the w 6100.10. and 980301 through 98103'0 do not a e. Upon the completion of enclosure (4) to MC0 6100.10, a page MC0 11 entry is authorized...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-02

    Original file (06813-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY SERGEANT E CASE OF STAFF MC 5. MC0 P5354.1C, Marine MC0 1610.12, the U.S. 3 . The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists deficiencies, recommendations for corrective action, and states that Staff opportunity to make a rebutta Additionally, the entry affords him an opportunity to annotate whether or not he desires to make such a statement and if made, a copy of the statement...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06732-00

    Original file (06732-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    118(11)"e", page 11 entry plication and Sergeant P1070.12J, Marine Corps Individual Records Administration (IRAM), authorizes commanders to make entries on page 11 One of the many leadership tools that a commander has at Marine Corps policy is that reasonable efforts at MC0 2. equest for removal 118(11)"e" page 11 b. Disapprove Staff Sergeant equest that the statement dated (2), be This document does not meet the guidelines 4010.2e of the IRAM and paragraph 6106 of 17Jun00,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04822-99

    Original file (04822-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The adverse letter qualifies as "other reports, or correspondence of a military nature" per paragraph b . d. The adverse letter was the result of a report to CMC Sergean Sergean (MMPR-2) by known by this Divis rebutted by 4. provide advisory opinion and recommendations. the adverse fitness report precipitated the adverse letter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-00

    Original file (08381-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner has offered absolutely no documentary that he missed only six hours of class Finally, while paragraph nine of enclosure (5) to evidence whatsoever to prove his allegations that his absences were due to medical reasons or that the report itself contains "false statements" (i.e., vice 60). The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists specific deficiencies and recommendations for corrective found, and states that Sergeant to make a...