NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor Navy Recruiting Command and the Seaman Apprentice Garcia has a valid EB Contract in the amount 5 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07286-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07290-02
Pursuant to the pro filed enclosure (1) with corrected to establish e Bonus (SRB) for NEC 1160 Ser 8 1 l/443 of 29 October 2002 ns of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be t to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment 2. The Board, consisting Mr. Beckett, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of regulations, determined th available evidence of reco enclosures, naval records, and injustice on 26...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07295-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07296-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that naval record be corrected to show that he was retired by reason of physical disability, vice discharged by reason of misconduct. On 2 December 1996, he was advised by the Executive Secretary, Naval Discharge Review Board, that his request for upgrade of his discharge had been denied. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07298-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07301-01
7301-01 16 May 2002 Chairman, Secretary of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records From: To: Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps applied to this Board requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 4 March 1955. that his naval record be corrected to The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07302-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to sell a total of 40 days of LSL in conjunction with his reenlistment of 12 July 2001. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07306-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. change will give the member an EAOS of 27 September 2003. recommend the petitioner's enlistment This Additionally, this change will allow the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07308-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07312-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. NJPs, the Board concluded that the Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07314-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your military behavior and overall At the time of on military behavior and In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, limited...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07316-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Even though you were recommended for retention, The Board concluded that the discharge by Concerning the nonrecommendation for reenlistment, which equates to an RE-4 reenlistment code, Navy regulations require such...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07317-01
ItGKBtt is assigned when Separation code discharged by reason of misconduct due an individual is to civil conviction.4 q- On 20 June 2001 Petitioner's counsel faxed a supplemental letter of deficiency to NAVPERSCOM responding, in part, as follows to the 4 May 2001 letter from COMPHIBGRU TWO: Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-710 if the (ADB) finds that the preponderance of the evidence does not support one or more of the reasons for separation alleged and recommends retention then the Separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07324-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07328-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 10 October 2002. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was erroneous or unjust, and establishes that your condition was incurred in the line of duty, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07329-02
supports a diagnosis of a personality disorder. documents (sustained irritability, paranoia, not mixing well with people) are seen in personality disorders, including the one (Avoidant Personality Disorder) with which the Navy psychiatrists diagnosed this patient. A condition * The symptoms documented in the mental health assessments 3. meet DSM-IV criteria for a personality disorder -- see Reference The symptoms documented do not meet DSM-IV criteria for (c) either manic, hypomanic, major...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07330-02
atbched as enclosure CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting limited relief, specifically, removal of Petitioner ’s failure of selection for promotion. That Petitioner’s record be corrected so that he will be considered by the earliest possible selection board convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to lieutenant colonel as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07334-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge was erroneous, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07335-00
The fitness reports in question are valid reports. c. The member may request the reporting senior to submit a Fitness Report Letter Supplement or Supplemental Fitness Report to reflect the changes the member requested. selection board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07335-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07336-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs.: Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07338-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence that demonstrates that your discharge was improper, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07341-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of togetheriwith all material submitted in support your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations Your allegations of error and After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07342-02
As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed removal of the contested section K. Petitioner further requested removal of his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year 2003 Major Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of major as an officer who has not failed of selection to that grade. ith Head,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07350-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07352-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ’ McBride, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07354-02
’s ’s record and C. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner’ s naval record. By enclosure 3. with a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained a (3), this Headquarters provide Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07356-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. that there is no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07357-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was forfeiture of restriction for 45 days, reduction to E- nonjudical punishment On 23 April 1983, the commanding officer (CO) informed you that you were being processed for administrative discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07358-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were so discharged on 28 October 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07369-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition., the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07374-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07379-01
You reenlisted in the Navy on 26 February 1974 for four years in the rate of You then served in an excellent manner for several years. However, the two performance evaluations covering the period 1 October 1976 until 25 February 1978 are adverse and you were not recommended for advancement or retention in the Navy in either evaluation. evaluations indicate that you did not want to be in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07382-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 7382-02 4 September 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy . The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your offenses were At that time, you Based on the foregoing record, you were processed for an administrative discharge by reason of misconduct. The Board The Board concluded that the Regulations require the assignment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07383-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 20350-2000 54rQl@PLV REFER TO N130D1/02U0589 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NAVAL RECORDS BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj : HE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07383-02 with microfiche service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07384-01
Punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 and 10 days e. Petitioner then continued to serve without further However, on 19 November incident, receiving two performance evaluations, that assigned a satisfactory overall rating of 3.4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, 3R. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07384-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the date and term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mimer, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07386-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07388-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, you were diagnosed with a severe At that time you Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07390-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07392-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your husband record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’s naval After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. It noted, however, that he was He was discharged with entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07393-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You then On that date you The for the periods ending 31 The enlisted performance record (page 9) shows that in You were released from active duty in the rate of FA on You enlisted in the Navy on 24 August 1987 at age 20. served without incident until 13 December 1990. received nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07396-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application OR 22 August 2002. You also received multiple ratings of 0% and one of 10 % for The Board was not persuaded that your mood disorder was ratable above 30% disabling at the time of your permanent retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07396-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTR rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07404-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In connection with this processing, On 3 June 1982 the discharge In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07410-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy MEH: ddj Docket No: 7410-02 26 November 2002 Refi Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B”...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07412-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GM2c is the entry on your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07418-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...