DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
CRS
Docket No: 7506-01
7 February 2002
Section 1552.
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 February 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 28 July
1992 and reported to active duty.
conducted on 5 February 1993,
disorder and noted that you were parasuicidal.
also stated that you had attempted or feigned suicide by cutting
your wrist.
While your record does not contain the separation processing
documents, it appears that the commanding officer recommended
that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of a
personality disorder and,
authority, the recommendation for separation was approved.The
record clearly shows that you were discharged on 22 March 1993
with a-general discharge by reason of a diagnosed personality
disorder.
RE-4.
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by
regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual
found that you had a personality
The evaluation
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of
after review by the discharge
A psychiatric evaluation,
separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially if
a servicemember is deemed to be a threat to himself or others.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in
your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed,
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
since you did not ask for such
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03920-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded since you submitted no evidence that you were incorrectly diagnosed with a personality disorder, there is no basis to change the reason for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03502-02
discharge by reason of personality disorder, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use However, it cannot change a NDRB is Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02717-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07890-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 31 July 2001 at age 18. on 27 August 2002 you received nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06017-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02040-03
'I A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05148-02
of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1994 you were diagnosed On 29 On 5 January 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05803-01
stated: them" This tirade continued all the way to sickbay, You repeatedly you better get me off of here before I kill one of “Dot, You admitted On the same day, you underwent a psychiatric evaluation due to your angry outburst and threatening a master chief. Punishment consisted of a reduction in rate to BT3, On 18 February 1994 you were separated with a general discharge by reason of personality disorder and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. that board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02586-02
the separation authority directed separation, you received an general discharge 2001, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. byyeason of personality disorder on 30 March You After Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of Due to the severity of your personality personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07490-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The On 5 The Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...