DEPARTMENTOFTHENAVY
CORRECTION OF N A V AL
BOARD FOR
RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH : ddj
Docket No:
7 January 2003
7492-W
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1)
(2)
(3)
149’ w/attachments
DD Form
NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 8 1
Subject’s naval record
l/504 of 3 December 2002
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to establish entitlement to a zone
HM rating (NEC 8432).
“B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
I
Upon review and considera ‘on of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
(2), t
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
e Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
:
Docket No: 7492-02
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The reenlistment executed on or about 10 August 2001 is for a term of 4 years, vice
3 years.
b. This change will entitle petitioner to a zone
rating (NEC 8432).
“B” SRB, award level 2.0, for the HM
C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
. !%iEicP
Acting Recorder
.
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
7 January 2003
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03979-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the HM(8432) rate/NEC.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Haney, Mr Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807860
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: tj Docket No: 7860-98 29 June 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: (eee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11063-08
11063-08 12 May 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.8$.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02091-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05694-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus: (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11989-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. 11989-10 1 Mar 11 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TGs Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01638-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsaiman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 May 2009 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03491-10
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10177-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dietrich, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09320-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C’ Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the HM rating (NEC 8478). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Brezna, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...