Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07524-02
Original file (07524-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 7524-02
3 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 3 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

l/448 of 17 October 2002, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

143 0
Ser 
17 

811/&Q

Ott 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL 

RECORDS 

(BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

CASE OF

Ref:

(a) BUPERSINST 1430.163

Encl:

(1) BCNR file 

#07524-02

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference

1.
(a), enclosure (1) is returned with the following action.

Petty Officer
2.
additional award p
commendation.

equested to be awarded two
rom receiving Flag letters of

Maximum award points that can be awarded from
Petty Officer

etters of commendation is two points.
was already awarded one point for a Flag letter of

commendation and we have corrected his record to reflect an
additional award point giving him the maximum two points
allowed for Flag letters of commendation.

Lwz

direction

BY



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09999-07

    Original file (09999-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 811/034 of 11 January 2008, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03981-01

    Original file (03981-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 8 11 of attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 5 December 2001, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02

    Original file (08243-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Year Submarine Career Screening Gate Submarine Service Entry Date CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002. Per reference (a), reached his Petty Officer The Enlisted Master Record his actual total TOSS is 68 months.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01412-02

    Original file (01412-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02836-02

    Original file (02836-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07675-02

    Original file (07675-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02354-03

    Original file (02354-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVYANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 2Ot 10 June t 2354-03 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record purs provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. mt to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in considered your application on 10 June 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02

    Original file (07179-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N133D1000270 of 8 October 2002, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05210-02

    Original file (05210-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05186-02

    Original file (05186-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached. reference (,a), entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching his 12 YRGT.