NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06360-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 17 June 1999 you received an other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06365-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board ’s review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06367-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory In this connection, the Board substantially You are entitled to have the Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06370-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. names and votes of the paygrade accession via the PRISE III program, except for AECF, CTI(N), paygrade E3. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06378-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 6378-02 3 September 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he renegotiated his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06379-02
S JLP:ddj Docket No: 6379-02 3 September 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to that he renegotiated his Dental...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06380-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06381-02
S JLP:ddj Docket No: 638 l-02 3 September 2002 DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06382-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he renegotiated his Dental Officer Multiyear Retention Bonus (DOMRB) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06383-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additio?, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06389-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged for being not physically qualified for service, vice by reason of unsatisfactory participation. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Frankfurt and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 9 January 2003 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06395-02
S MEH: ddj Docket No: 16 October 639502 2002 DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy t Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06397-02
06397-02 28 February 2003This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06398-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 10 July 1941 at the age of 18. were so discharged on 13 January 1943.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06399-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 9 May 1968 you were convicted by special martial (SPCM) of an 86 day period of UA and were awarded confinement at hard labor for five months and a $450...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06400-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 20 April 1981 you received an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06403-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in suppo applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06403-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. The Board concluded that you were not physically qualified for military service, and that you would not have been permitted to enlist had you disclosed the disqualifying conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06406-02
A three-member panel of tl h session, considered your aJ injustice were reviewed in applicable to proceedin consisted of your applicatic applicabk naval record and the g 9’ i : 1 Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ication on 12 December 2002. You underwent ; examining physician noted Woos of the ears traumatic determined that you were f to the Naval Reserve on 5 completed two years of ser discharged on 15 January 1 listed in the Navy on 16 January 1967. of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06409-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06411-02
As you may kn fitness for military duty cases where the service presumption of fitness, disorder were considered insufficient to warrant any corrective ove, you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty, isability separation or retirement of a service member. The Veterans Administration and the Gulf War Health rked up these multiple medical problems without definitely defining was found “fit” for retirement, his case was not referred to the PEB r not he was eligible for medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06412-02
This was her second failure of selection for promotion to commander. However, they do not feel this would be remedial, as Petitioner did not request it; and NPC has advised that if she were considered by such a special selection board, a failure of selection might well result, which would effectively negate the benefit of removing her failure by the FY 03 Line Commander Selection Board. from the Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF FLEET SUPPORT OFFICERS’ REDESIGNATION...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06418-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, those portions of your naval record which could be located, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06419-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06420-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6420-02 16 October 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06427-98
Subj : I N THE CASE d. The following correction of her record is recommended to accurately account for the Petitioner ’s condition: CATEGORY I: Unfitting conditions: 1. DC 20374-5023 542 0 Ser: 00-1 6 26 Sep 200 0 From: To: Subj: Ref: Director, Executive Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards Board for Correction of Naval Records (a) Chairman, (b) SECNAVINST BCNR JRE:jdh DN: 6427-98 ltr of 14 Jun 2000 1850.4D SE OF This responds to reference (a) which requested comments and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06429-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06432-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. Notwithstanding those findings, the VA awarded you a 60% rating under VA cod 5293, effective from 17 July 1999, for pronounced intervertebral disc disease, which is the highest permitted rating for that condition. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06432-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Pauling, and McPartlin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06433-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5326. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06435-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2002. Your were discharged on 27 July 1972 pursuant to the approved findings of a medical board that you failed to meet the minimum physical standards for enlistment because of the residual effects of a knee injury you sustained in January 1972, which you failed to disclose when you underwent your pre- enlistment physical examination. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06439-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application on 31 October 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06442-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06450-01
6450-01 29 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy From: To: Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 December 1952. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06453-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the disciplinary action taken, paygrade E-l and a $50 forfeiture of However, the record does not reflect if any, for these periods of UA. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06453-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2003. The fact that the VA has awarded you substantial disability ratings is not probative of the existence of error in your Navy record, because the VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06456-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that when Petitioner was reassigned to NAVHOSP, Yokosuka, Japan government travel was authorized. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06461-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD ANNEX NAVY 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy S LCC:ddj Docket No: 6461-02 20 November 2002 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06464-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment received on 6 April 20. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner should have been discharged because of a condition, not a disability, interfering with his performance of duty, because of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06470-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he renegotiated his Dental Officer Multiyear Retention Bonus (DOMRB) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Mr. Partlin, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06477-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06487-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 August 2002. After being advised of the findings and recommendation of the medical board, you waived your right to appear before the Physical Evaluation Board to contest your proposed discharge, and you requested to be discharged from the Marine Corps as soon as possible, without entitlement to disability Available records indicate that you benefits administered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06491-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 30ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 17 January 2003 6491-W This is in refe naval record pu States Code sectio to your application for correction of your to the provisions of Title 10 of the United he Board for Correction of Naval Your allegations of error and executive session, considered your anuary 2003. ewed in accordance with administrative cedures applicable to the proceedings of this material considered by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06492-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X WASHINGTON D C 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 6492-02 15 April 2003 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF - (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve , filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show additional retirement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06497-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06499-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Sub_ject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. Messrs.‘Frankfurt, Tew, and Carlsen, reviewed Petitioner ’s 2. The Board, consisting of allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2002 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06500-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was credited with three years of reserve service not shown on his statement of service, that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 9 August 1990, and transferred to the Retired...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06502-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially...