Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06360-02
Original file (06360-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No:   6360-02
27 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2002.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application,
together with all material submitted in support
thereof,
your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 June
1995.
The record reflects that you received three nonjudicial
punishments and were convicted by a summary court-martial.
offenses included absence from your appointed place of duty on
ten occasions, breaking restriction on two occasions, making a
false official statement on three occasions, and writing a bad
check.
On 10 May 1999 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason reason
of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present
your case to an administrative discharge board.
the discharge authority,
the recommendation for separation was
approved and on 17 June 1999 you received an other than honorable
discharge.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and

When informed of
After review by

Th e

However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your four disciplinary actions within a period of less than
Therefore, the Board concluded that no change to the
four years.
Accordingly, your application has been
discharge is warranted.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have the

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07403-10

    Original file (07403-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights to consulting with legal counsel and present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB), your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06722-01

    Original file (06722-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. estab-lish the existence of probable material The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 September 1989. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01373-02

    Original file (01373-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record *and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. regard, the record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03315-02

    Original file (03315-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The offenses...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9801771

    Original file (NC9801771.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_17_53 CDT 2000

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your record reflects that you received four The offenses included unauthorized While the discharge processing documents are not available, it appears that the commanding officer then recommended that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR481 14

    Original file (NR481 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse at which time you waived your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08456-04

    Original file (08456-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 March 1986. After review by the discharge...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01984-02

    Original file (01984-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 14 June 1983 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct and unsuitability based...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02196-06

    Original file (02196-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 November 1997 at age 19. on 13 December 1998 following an...