DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
S
JRE
Docket No: 64 18-01
21 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title
10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, those portions of your
naval record which could be located, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was
insufticient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board was unable to accept your uncorroborated contention to the effect that you were
hospitalized for treatment of a back injury and schizophrenia in 1949. In addition, it had no
untit for duty by reason of physical disability when you
basis for concluding that you were
were released from active duty on 19 September 1949. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04698-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As a result of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02684-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 WMP Docket No: 3 October 2002 2684-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval United States Code section 1552. record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07059-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02268-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. suspended on probation until 13 January 1949. received two nonjudicial punishments for disobedience, insolence and an unauthorized absence of one day. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05806-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 30 September 1949 you were discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02402-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01187-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable materialThe Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1946 at age 18. On 1 October 1948 you were convicted by deck...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07187-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09002-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09130-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 1942. You were transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 April 1961. completed the 20 years of qualifying service for eligibility for retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.