Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06450-01
Original file (06450-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

ELP
Docket No. 6450-01
29 January 2002

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

(a) 10 U.S.C.1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's Naval Record

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to
show a more favorable type of discharge than the general
discharge issued on 19 December 1952.

The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs Chapman and

2.
McCulloch, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 24 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

3.
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that Petitioner's application to

the Board was not filed in a timely manner, it is in the
interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and
review the application on its merits.

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on  

30 September

1949 for three years at age  
formal education.
incident until 20 July 1950,
court-martial of sleeping on post.
confinement for one month and forfeitures of $20 per month for
four months.

He was advanced to PFC and served without

when he was convicted by summary

At that time, he had 11 years

He was sentenced to

17.

d.

Petitioner served in Korea from August 1950 to August
1951, participating in the seizure of  
Inchon, the capture of
Seoul, the campaigns at Wonsan/Hungnam/Chosin, and operations
against enemy forces in south and central Korea.
period he was advanced to CPL (E-4).
discharge on 19 December 1952.

He received a general

During this

e.

At the time of Petitioner's discharge, character of

service is based, in part, on conduct and proficiency averages
computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations.
final conduct and proficiency averages were 3.93 and 5.5,
respectively.
A minimum average mark of 4.0 in conduct was
required for a fully honorable characterization of service.

Your

f.

A Federal Bureau of Investigation report on Petitioner,

obtained by the Board,

showed no post-service convictions.

CONCLUSION:

In this regard, the Board notes Petitioner's youth and

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
immaturity, limited education, his combat service in Korea
during which he was promoted to CPL,
and his good post-service
conduct.
The Board further notes that his summary court-martial
conviction occurred prior to his being sent to Korea and that he
had no further disciplinary actions.
conduct average of 3.93 was fairly close to the 4.0 average
required for an honorable discharge.
at great peril for his country and the Board believes his
sacrifice far outweighs any deficiency in meeting the require-
ment of a 4.0 conduct average.
useful purpose is served by continuing to stigmatize his service
as under honorable conditions.
that it would be appropriate and just to recharacterize the
general discharge to honorable.

The Board believes that no

Further, Petitioner's

Accordingly, the Board concludes

Petitioner placed his life

2

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show

that he was honorably discharged by reason of expiration of
enlistment on 19 December 1952 vice the general discharge
actually issued on that date.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

C .

That upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs

be informed that Petitioner's application was received by the
Board on 16 August 2001.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations,
and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

GOLDSMITH

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6

5.
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6
(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is
action, taken
hereby announced that the foregoing corrective
under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05541-01

    Original file (05541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You served without further incident and received a general discharge upon the expiration of your enlistment on 15 September 1953. of 4.0 in conduct was required for a fully honorable characteri- zation of service at the time of your discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06307-01

    Original file (06307-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two conviction, and your failure to achieve the required average in conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01582-01

    Original file (01582-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the separation under honorable conditions and the subsequent general discharge. A retired Marine colonel states that Petitioner is a good citizen and he believes an injustice was done in this case. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01801-05

    Original file (01801-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr., Mr.and Mr., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show he was separated with an honorable discharge on 3 August 1954 and that he was recommended for reenlistment, vice the under honorable conditions discharge and the non-recommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05531-00

    Original file (05531-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    5531-00 8 February 2002 From: To: Subj Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy OF (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 2 December 1962. that his naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04329-11

    Original file (04329-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge of 20 January 1952 be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dixit, Mr. Pfeiffer and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03468-01

    Original file (03468-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3468-01 31 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (b) Navy-Marine Corps Awards Manual (1) DD Form (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 149‘w/attachments I From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 May 1972 and that he be awarded the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01854-99

    Original file (01854-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1854-99 12 August 1999 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy/Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06258-00

    Original file (06258-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three a deck court and a summary court-martial, and failure to received the require average in conduct. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10024-07

    Original file (10024-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, applied to this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded. His last act of misconduct which resulted in his receiving an undesirable discharge (UD) occurred on 14 september 1954 when he was convicted by civil authorities of being a “peeping tom.” CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that as a matter clemency Petitioner’s request for an upgrade of his UD should be granted. ...