Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06429-01
Original file (06429-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 6429-01
15 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 4 December 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application   has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

  NAV Y

BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON 

TN 38055-000

L

0

IN REPLY REFER   T O

1160
PERS-811
04 DEC  01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd  16 Jul 01

Ref:

Encl:

(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) NAVADMIN 
(1) BCNR File

050/00
049/01

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

a.
ETl.

an 

The petitioner reenlisted on   15 Jun 01 for four years as

b.

References (a) and (b) both indicate that graduates of

NEC 2779 training who are not in the IT rating are not entitled to
SRB based on NEC 2779.

In view of the above,

2.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of the

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the

4.
Board for Correction of Naval Records
is returned.

(BCNR)

only.

Enclosure (1)

tment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06615-01

    Original file (06615-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. At the time of the petitioner's reenlistment on 21 February 1991, - 0430 or STG reference (b) was in effect.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05024-01

    Original file (05024-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2001. reference The petitioner graduated from HM "C" school on 18 April At the time the petitioner negotiated and received...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01

    Original file (00896-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06314-01

    Original file (06314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03083-01

    Original file (03083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and injustice session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June is attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use recommend the petitioner's record In view of the above, only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03259-02

    Original file (03259-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 mh MEH: Docket No: 9 July 2002 3259-02 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the Ilnitctl States Code, section 1552. iOr correcticm 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive panel three-nlember- A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01519-01

    Original file (01519-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01272-01

    Original file (01272-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 1160 PERS 815 of 13 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was attached on board UIC 62229. b.