Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06369-01
Original file (06369-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100

CRS
Docket No: 
13 February 

6369-01
2002

Your allegations of error and

a copy of which is attached.

application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United

Dear
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 February 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
opinion furnished by the Awards Branch, Headquarters Marine Corps
dated 4 December 2001,
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

In this connection, the Board substantially

You are entitled to have the

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

2

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y

EADQUAATERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280 R US SE LL ROA D
QIJANTICO. VIRGINIA 22134-5103

IN 

AEPLV  REFER TO:

1650
MMMA-3
4DecOl

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL  

RECORDS ( BCNR )

Subj:

REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION(S) IN THE CASE  

_ FORMER MARINE

OFyI)IIIIIIIIyIy

1. Mr
in the U.S. Marine Corps:

~,is entitled to the following awards for his service

Combat Action Ribbon for service in Vietnam

National Defense Service Medal

Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze stars

Republic of Vietnam Meritorious Unit Citation
(Gallantry Cross Color with palm)

Rifle Sharpshooter Badge

During the period he served in the Marine Corps, regulations

2.
required 3 years of continuous active duty to be eligible for
the Good Conduct Medal.
active duty from February 17, 1969, to November 9, 1970, since
this period is less than 3 years,
he would not be entitled to
the Good Conduct Medal.

The records show that he served on

He is not entitled to the Republic of Vietnam Campaign

To be entitled to this award an individual must serve 6
The record book shows he served in Vietnam

November<7,  1969, which is less than the

3.
Medal.
months in Vietnam.
from August 19 to  
required 6 months.

The Fleet Marine Force Ribbon and Insignia are authorized to

4.
Navy personnel who serve with Marine Corps units.
not a member of the U.S. Navy,
these awards.

he is not entitled to either of

Since he was

5.

A point of contact at MMMA is

0.784-9210.

5. ORIGINAL 

DD FORM 214 IS CORRECTED AS INDICATED BELOW:

SEPA
Seria

ORM 214 BEING CORRECTED: 

CORRECTED TO READ
09 Nov 70

SVC#
Comb
Vietnam Meritorious 

24

31

bon, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service  

Medalw/two bronze stars, Republic of

Unit Citation(Gallantry 

Cross Color w/palm), Rifle Sharpshooter Badge

6. DATE

(YYYYMMDD)

OFFICIAL AUTHORIZED TO SIGN



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05890-01

    Original file (05890-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2 October 2001, a copy of which is attached. evidence in your records that you were engaged in actions that would entitle you to this award.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06987-09

    Original file (06987-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09058-09

    Original file (09058-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that he be issued all awards and medals he is entitled to for service in Vietnam. The Board, consisting of — | Es and Mr. == reviewed Petitioner's allegati or and injustice on 25 August 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10020-06

    Original file (10020-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the letter furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), dated 13 December 2005, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01074-01

    Original file (01074-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2001, a copy of which is attached. they were not present and cannot attest Statements from which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04062-02

    Original file (04062-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record.and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the letter to and policies. including the Bronze Star Medal, However, Subtitle C, Section 526 of the National Defense provides for the consideration of award Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1996, which was enacted into law on February 10, 1996, recommendations, you be able to locate your former commanding officer or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606034C070209

    Original file (9606034C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Meritorious Unit Citation, the Air Medal, the Bronze Star Medal with “V” and gold star (from the Marine Corps), the Navy/Marine Corps Presidential Unit Citation and the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with palm (3rd award). The same regulation, insofar as it pertains to the Air Medal, states, that it is awarded to any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007781

    Original file (20120007781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal from 20 September 1967 to 22 May 1969. a. e. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show the award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006197

    Original file (20140006197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service; there is no evidence of a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during his period of service * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) all the awards listed on his DD Form 214 and the following: *...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06364-01

    Original file (06364-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You received the general discharge on 26 April 1974. and that you be issued the medals to which you are entitled.