Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV ’
CORDS
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RE
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 6406-02
19 December 2002
This is in reference to
provisions of title 10 of
yam
the
pplication for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
Jnited States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of tl
h
session, considered your
aJ
injustice were reviewed in
applicable to
proceedin
consisted of your applicatic
applicabk
naval record and
the
g
9’
i
:
1
Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
ication on 12 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
cordance with administrative regulations and procedures
of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
tatutes, regulations and policies.
1i
After careful and conscient
us consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
I
ficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
evidence submitted was ins
injustice.
The Board found that you
t
action while serving in Vie
treatment. You underwent
;
examining physician noted
Woos of the ears
traumatic
determined that you were f
to the Naval Reserve on 5
completed two years of ser
discharged on 15 January 1
listed in the Navy on 16 January 1967. You were wounded in
am on 14 August 1970, and were evacuated for medical
Ire-separation physical examination on 30 September 1971. The
at you multiple facial wounds, several missing teeth, and
Face, neck eyelids, and legs, as well as multiple scars. He
for duty, notwithstanding those defects, and you were transferred
:tober 1971. While a member of the Naval Reserve, you
ze qualifying for reserve retirement. You were honorably
14.
The Board was not persuad
physical disability at the tir
physically qualified for disc
yc
Naval Reserve following
unsubstantiated contention
I
I that you were unfit to perform your duties by reason of
of your discharge. As previously noted, you were found
uge, and completed two years of satisfactory service in the
I release from
the effect that
active
you suffer from unspecified disabilities which are
accepi your
duty.
It did not
and votes of the members
It is regretted that
important to keep in mind
applicant to demonstrate t
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
f the panel will be furnished upon request.
of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
In this regard, it is
previously considered by the Board.
at a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
of an official naval record, the burden is on the
of probable material error or injustice.
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09081-07
’ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. The Board concluded that your receipt of VA disability ratings for multiple conditions effective the day following your release from active duty is not probative of the existence of material error or injustice in your Navy record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07516-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 October 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You contended that you had difficulty You did not contend that your and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06411-02
As you may kn fitness for military duty cases where the service presumption of fitness, disorder were considered insufficient to warrant any corrective ove, you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty, isability separation or retirement of a service member. The Veterans Administration and the Gulf War Health rked up these multiple medical problems without definitely defining was found “fit” for retirement, his case was not referred to the PEB r not he was eligible for medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01631-02
With regard to the member's complaint of limitation of motion in her The member was neck, the medical board focuses on her neck surgery. exam was The member dermatomal distributions, but there's nothing in the claimed that she needed to walk with a cane, The medical board to suggest why she would member also complained of subjective pain in her low back which she said it made her difficult for her to sit for long periods of time. carpal tunnel syndrome with bilateral numbness which has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09714-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. The Board found that you enlisted in the US Marine Corps Reserve (USMCR) on 17 November 1971, and served on initial active duty for training from 18 November 1971 to 16 May 1972. The VA rating officials noted that you had submitted an altered copy of a DD Form 214 which purported to establish that you had served in Vietnam, when in fact you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06414-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01180-07
Specifically, the panel of the Board that considered your case was not persuaded you were issued the silencing order described in your application, that you suffered from posttraumatic stress disorder while serving on active duty in the Navy, or that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability prior to your separation from the Navy. Two other survivors of the Liberty attack have applied for correction of their naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08108-02
US consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the Fficient to establish the existence of probable material error or a pre-enlistment physical examination on 16 November history contained in the Report of Medical History you history of chicken pox and “gas”. The 30% rating was made (BVA) found that the The Board was not pers service during the 23 Aug service history of bowel ADT, it is very likely th and not aggravated by y that you were unfit for d is a prerequisite...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05703-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It noted that you did not complain of any of the hallmark symptoms of that disorder during your Navy service, or for many years thereafter, and there is no indication in your Navy record that you were suffering from a significant mental disorder prior to your discharge. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04505-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...