DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No:
20 May 2002
6409-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 May 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.The Board rejected your unsubstantiated contention that you were “exposed to
radiation chemical in a vacuum tubes [sic], as I was a clerk.
corrective action was warranted in your case.
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application has been
” It was not persuaded that any
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03474-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 October 2001 at age 17. Subsequently, your request for discharge was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04274-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you suffered from a mental or physical disorder which was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of service, and rendered you unfit by reason of physical disability, as opposed to unsuitable for service, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09126-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that on 26 April 2002, the Physical Evaluation Board made preliminary findings that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10075-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08875-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06923-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. It clearly existed prior to your naval service, and it was not aggravated by your That condition is incompatible with naval As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit to perform your duties because of a disability incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06418-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, those portions of your naval record which could be located, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06509-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 April 2002 at age 25. On 25 April 2002 your commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07237-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. were reviewed in accordance. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05390-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together 'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the...