Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06487-02
Original file (06487-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 6487-02
26 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 August 2002. Your allegations of error and
tiith administrative regulations and procedures
injustice were reviewed in accordance  
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted In the Marine Corps on 18 September 1989. On 20 March
1990, a medical board gave you a diagnosis of bilateral patellofemoral syndrome, existed
prior to entry, not service aggravated, and recommended that you be discharged by reason of
failure to meet the minimum physical standards for enlistment.
After being advised of the
findings and recommendation of the medical board, you waived your right to appear before
the Physical Evaluation Board to contest your proposed discharge, and you requested to be
discharged from the Marine Corps as soon as possible, without entitlement to disability
Available records indicate that you
benefits administered by the Department of the Navy.
were dissatisfied with the medical treatment you had received for your condition, which was
manifested by symptoms which were largely subjective in nature, and it appears that you had
requested a congressional investigation into the circumstances of your medical treatment.
You were discharged in accordance with your request on 25 April 1990. You were assigned
RE-3P, which is not an absolute bar to reenlistment, as you would be
a reenlistment code of  
eligible to reenlist in the  
condition, and were otherwise qualified.

eve& that you obtained a waiver of your disqualifying physical

The Board was not persuaded that your discharge was erroneous or unjust.
discharged because you had a disqualifying condition that prevented you from fully
participating in military training at that time, and was not responsive to treatment
above, you did not object to the discharge, and in fact, requested that you be discharged as
soon as possible. The fact that your condition became quiescent shortly after you left the
Marine Corps, although relevant to the issue of your present qualification for military service,
is insufficient to demonstrate that you met the minimum physical standards for enlistment in
1989.

You were

 

. As noted

In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07721-09

    Original file (07721-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You had no military status during the period from 26 June 1979 to 19 December 1988. , The Board considered your application and all pertinent records in accordance with the provisions of SECNAV Instruction 5420.193, enclosure (1), Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (codified at 32 CFR 723), paragraph 3e. During the 1979-1989 period, you received treatment from VA health care providers for multiple conditions such as hip, back and knee pain, chronic recurrent foot pain,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04460-02

    Original file (04460-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 20 June 1969. evaluated by a medical board on 26 September 1969, and given a diagnosis of You disclosed to the medical board that you had suffered a crushing injury to ; years...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01541-01

    Original file (01541-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. must receive a fully honorable characterization of service in order to receive benefits. Based on the foregoing, you are neither eligible to receive basic educational benefits nor are you eligible to receive a refund of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06250-08

    Original file (06250-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting iri executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2009. It noted that you did not report symptoms of a mental disorder when you applied for reenlistment in 1985, or during your pre-separation physical examination in 1989. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04424-00

    Original file (04424-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. condition was incurred in or aggravated by your service, or that your discharge was otherwise erroneous, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03743-08

    Original file (03743-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the period from 26 June. The Board also considered the medical documentation submitted in support of your case. It also appears that your fraud continued when you enlisted in the Army National Guard by obtaining a waiver of your physical disability while serving in the Marine Corps and, by omission of your service in the Navy, which included the diagnosis of a severe personality disorder and nonrecommendation for reenlistment, both resulting in the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04766-03

    Original file (04766-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Due to administrative error, your DD Form 214 indicates that you were both discharged from the Marine Corps and retired by reason of physical disability on that date. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03617-02

    Original file (03617-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application on 15 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. PHYSICAL BECAUSE OF DISABILITY. AFTER CAREFUL REVIEW OF ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE AND BASED ON UNANIMOUS OPINION OF THE HEARING PANEL, THE PHYSICAL EVALUATION BOARD FINDS THE MEMBER UNFIT FOR FULL DUTY IN THE U.S....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04832-07

    Original file (04832-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 3 March 1967. On 21 September 1982, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06208-09

    Original file (06208-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval, Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...