DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 6172-02
13 November 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC 1160 Ser 8 1
l/425 of 10 October 2002, a copy of which is attached.
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. Adjusting the date of advancement to
would, in effect, be the same as approving your previous request for automatic
E5 under the provisions of the STAR program.
for automatic advancement under STAR because the
2000 was not on the CSL at the time of your reenlistment.
E5, via the normal advancement cycle, on 16 September 2001. Though it is unfortunate you
were led to believe you would be advanced upon completion of school that in itself is not
justification for granting your request.
In this connection, the Board did not concur with the
recommendation contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
paygrade E5 (STS2) effective 18 January 2000
advancment to
On 16 May 2000 the Board denied your request
“C” school you completed on 18 January
You were subsequently advanced
to
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No. 6172-02
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records, Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
Y
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref: (a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(1)
Encl:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 26 Jun 02
MILPERSMAN 1510-020
NAVADMIN
MILPERSMAN 1160-100
143/98
BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1 .
petitioner's request.
recommend approval to the
1160
Ser
10
811/425
2
act 200
a.
The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 07 January 1998 via
the benefits of the STAR program prior to attending NEC 0425
(CIN A-130-0360).
reenlistment.
The petitioner received a zone
"A" SRB for this
"C" school
b.
Reference (b) did not carry CIN:
A-130-0360(NEC 0425) on the
Career Schools List (CSL) at the time of petitioner's reenlistment.
C .
Reference
(c), released on 09 Jul 1998 added the CIN: A-130-0360
Per reference (d),
upon graduation from a Class
"C" school
"C" school package that is listed in the effective CSL at time
to the CSL.
or Class
of reenlistment.
d.
The petitioner requests automatic advancement upon the
"C" school training via the STAR program. The
completion date of 0425
petitioner completed TRIDENT LEVEL III MASTER OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
TECHNICIAN (NEC 0425) in on 18 January 2000.
In view of the above,
2 .
advancement to Petty Officer Second Class be backdated to 18 January
2000.
recommend petitioner's effective of
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
returned.
Enclosure (1) is
MMC(SS) USN
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03355-99
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, petitioner d i ; l not initia1l.y reenlist under the STAR program, because at the ti!r!,: of r=.enlistrnent, the STS rate was not. T h i s i s a n a d v i s o r y memorandum t o r e f e r e n c e ( a ) f o r t h e u s e by t h e Board f o r C o r r e c t i o n of Naval Records ( P N R ) o n p .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00792-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08443-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05735-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04624-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/459 dated 21 July 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...