Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06124-00
Original file (06124-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No: 6124-00
5 April 2001

Dear-

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 April 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

On 6 June 1983 you reported aboard the USS EXULTANT
Subsequently, you received nonjudicial punishment on two

The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 17
September 1962 and reported for two years of active duty on 1 May
1963.
(MS0
441).
occasions for disobedience and an unspecified period of
unauthorized absence.
Following the second nonjudicial
punishment on 24 July 1964, you served in a satisfactory manner
and were advanced to SN (E-3).
You were released from active
duty on 15 April 1965 with your service characterized as being
under honorable conditions.
Subsequently, you were issued a
general discharge at the end of your military obligation.

 

Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations_
Your conduct mark average was 2.85. A
minimum average mark of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time
of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of
service.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, low score on

The Board found that these factors were

1990's you were treated for a severe mental

the aptitude test and your contention that you did not  
offenses and that you must have been confused with someone else.
The Board also considered the documentation that you submitted
showing that in the  
illness and alcoholism.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given your disciplinary record and failure to achieve the
required average mark in conduct.
record, and you have submitted none, to indicate that someone
else committed the misconduct for which you were disciplined.
addition there is nothing in the record to connect your conduct
mental illness which was diagnosed
while in the Navy with the
about 25 years after your active service in the Navy.
concluded that the general discharge was proper as issued and no
change is warranted.

There is no evidence in the

cormnit any

In

The Board

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00352-01

    Original file (00352-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Naval Discharge Review Board denied the Board carefully weighed The Board concluded that the and the fact that it been more than Counsel contends that while it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03508-08

    Original file (03508-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03539-01

    Original file (03539-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were again advanced to PFC and On 9 June 1969 you were The DD Form 214 shows that you had three periods of lost time, UA from 10 February to 10 March 1967 and two periods of confinement from 11 April to 12 June and 22 October to 21 December 1967. for entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal commenced on 26 October 1967, the day after your summary court-martial conviction. The DD Form 214 also indicates that eligibility Regulations provided that individuals discharged for the convenience of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR411 13

    Original file (NR411 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 9 July 1981, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09586-05

    Original file (09586-05.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A minimum average mark of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07314-00

    Original file (07314-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your military behavior and overall At the time of on military behavior and In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, limited...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02125-01

    Original file (02125-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. leadership and supervisory During your second tour you On 21 January 1971 you received a The record shows that on 16 February 1971 You were You were Character of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02

    Original file (01073-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01363-01

    Original file (01363-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your application, thereof, Board was unable to obtain your service record and conducted its review based on the documentation submitted with your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07768-00

    Original file (07768-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ability to serve was impaired by personal, financial and family problems; You have submitted evidence showing that you were diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia in December 1978. factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated and lengthy Concerning the mental illness, periods of unauthorized absence. the advisory opinion concluded that there is no evidence that you were suffering from paranoid schizophrenia during the period...