Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02
Original file (06127-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

30ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 6127-02
17 December 2002

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the

application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member p
session, considered your
injustice were reviewed in
to the proceedings of this
your application, together

opinion furnished by NA
copy of which is attached.

After careful and
evidence submitted
injustice. In this c
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel

Act

oard for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
ication on 17 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
cordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
ard. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and

RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 

32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

n of the entire record, the Board found that the
cient to establish the existence of probable material error or
he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
ingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of

ill be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the  
You are entitled to have t
evidence or other matter n

circ

corr
when applying for a 
demonstrate the existence

stances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
oard reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
reviously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
arity attaches to all official records. Consequently,

n of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
robable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

r

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE  

38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 
04 

32/6197
Ott 02

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander, 
Executive Di

b

vy Recruiting Command
ector,

Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR 

REQUES'I

ICO

(a) COMNAVCF

'ITCOMINST 

1130.8F

(1) BCNR 

Dot

et Nr.

06127-02

disag

Recommend 

1.
and reference (a),
His current  
on his signed  
enlistment bonus  

contrac
enlis
ba

roval of enclosure (1).
NM did not enlist under PRISE III Program;

Per enclosure (1)

is 6Y0 Advanced Electronics and is reflected
He received a $7,000 dollar

ment contract.
ed on this contract.

This is an advi
2.
Correction of Naval

ory memorandum for use by the Board for
Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07741-02

    Original file (07741-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition., the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01395-02

    Original file (01395-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02808-02

    Original file (02808-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05306-02

    Original file (05306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04780-02

    Original file (04780-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05238-02

    Original file (05238-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. enlistment contract length is correct and should Three-year enlistments are not authorized as This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07826-02

    Original file (07826-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ap,lication on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6207 of 13 November 2002, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03647-02

    Original file (03647-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00744-02

    Original file (00744-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOh4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.