DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
'Dear
S
TJR
Docket No:
19 February 2002
6179-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 February 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 23 June 1980
Your record reflects that on 29 October 1981
at the age of 18.
you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for absence from your
appointed place of duty and were awarded a $90 forfeiture of pay
and extra duty for 14 days.
On 18 January 1982 you received NJP for absence from your
appointed place of duty and were awarded a $149 forfeiture of pay
and extra duty for 14 days.
,for failure to obey a lawful order and were awarded a $50
forfeiture of pay.
On 28 December 1982 you received NJP
Your record contains an administrative remarks entry which notes
that on 5 June 1983 you were counselled regarding an unspecified
period of unauthorized absence (UA),
military appearance,
duty, and assault.
received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty,
and assault.
failure to be at your appointed place of
Shortly thereafter, on 21 June 1983, you
The punishment imposed was a $171 forfeiture of pay
failure to maintain a proper
and restriction for 14 days.
your fifth NJP for wrongful use of marijuana.
imposed was a $400 forfeiture of pay,
for 30 days, and a reduction to
paygrade E-2.
On 31 October 1983 you received
The punishment
restriction and extra duty
Your record further reflects that on 12 January 1984 you were
notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of
misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
waived your rights to consult with legal counsel and to present
your case to an administrative discharge board.
officer recommended an other than honorable discharge by reason
of misconduct due to frequent involvement of a discreditable
nature with military authorities as evidenced by the five
NJPs.
On 25 January 1984, a staff judge advocate (SJA) found that the
administrative discharge action was sufficient in law and fact
and recommended discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug
abuse.
other than honorable discharge,
so discharged.
On 31 January 1984 the discharge authority directed an
and on 17 February 1984 you were
At that time you
Your commanding
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and your contention that you were
unfairly treated and that your misconduct only consisted of
oversleeping on a couple of occasions and being in a fight.
However, the Board concluded these factors and contentions were
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
because of your repetitive misconduct which resulted in five
and included the use of drugs.
Given all the circumstances of
your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as
issued and no change is warranted.
has been denied.
Accordingly, your application
NJPs
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
'In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04906-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07047-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 19 January 1981 at age 18. The punishment imposed was extra duty and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02379-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. January 1981 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07139-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record reflects that you served for a year and seven months without disciplinary incident but on 14 April 1981 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for assault and were awarded a $150 forfeiture of pay. received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07508-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2003. On 14 April 1983 you received NJP for breach of peace and assault and were awarded restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to paygrade E-2, and a $250 forfeiture of pay. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01200-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. absence from your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09615-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction df Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $275 per month for two months and 45 days of restriction and extra duty On 22 April 1982 you were counseled concerning your past performance and warned that further misconduct could result in processing for a less than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02085-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. were sentenced to a $378 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 60 days, and reduction to Your record further reflects that on 24 March 1984 you received NJP for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04252-01
Docket No: 4252-01 23 November 2001 .This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04644-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was reduction Your record further shows that you received NJP on 14 February 1985 for wrongful use of marijuana. forfeitures of $310 per month for two months, 45 days of restriction and extra...