DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 6131-00
23 February 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title
States Code section 1552.
10 of the United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 February 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You were considered to be a malingerer and were
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 May
1986 at age 18.
The record shows that you were referred for a
psychiatric evaluation after you ingested 20 pills in a suicidal
gesture.
diagnosed with an adjustment disorder which included passive
aggressive personality traits.
of separation processing due to your failure to adapt to the
Marine Corps environment.
your procedural rights.
directed an entry level separation by reason of entry level
performance and conduct.
code assigned was
JGAl.
You were so separated on 23 June 1986.
The separation program designator
(SPD)
On 18 June 1986 you were notified
At that time, you elected to waive
On 23 June 1986 the separation authority
The Board believed that your inability to adapt to the Marine
Corps was sufficient to support separation by reason of entry
level performance and conduct.
discharge for that reason was proper and no change is warranted.
The Board noted that an SPD of
reason for discharge of entry level performance and conduct.
The Board concluded that your
JGAl corresponds to the narrative
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01476-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You On 24 January 2001 your commanding officer forwarded the separation action, to the discharge authority. supported the RE-4 reenlistment code due to your failure to adapt to the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6976 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04418-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2010. On 19 July 1999, you were discharged from active duty with an entry level separation and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code based on your performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02697-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 July 1986 at age 20. As a result, you were administratively processed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02084-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 March 2003, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0686 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0447 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11025-07
by the Board a your application, together with all material submittedthereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 1 July 1986 at age 22. You were separated on 9 September 1986 with two months and nine days of active service.In your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7412-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2014. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02489-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning his inability to adapt to the military environment, and not being recommended for reenlistment due to suicidal ideations. COPY o f I was __ I...