DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
15 November
2969-02
2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together'with all material submitted in support
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You reported to active duty on 19 September
The offenses included unauthorized absences
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 19 July
1977 at age 17.
The record reflects that you received eight nonjudicial
1977.
punishments.
totalling 24 days, failure to obey a lawful order, absence from
your appointed place of duty on 11 occasions, falsely altering a
liberty card, possession of marijuana on two occasions,
possession of a switchblade knife,
movement.
general discharge by reason of burden to command.
you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
Subsequently, on 28 December 1979 you received a
sleeping on post and missing
At that time,
Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and
overall traits averages, both of which are computed from marks
assigned during periodic evaluations.
trait averages were 1.60 and 2.13, respectively.
marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.7 in overall traits were required
for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of
your separation.
Your conduct and overall
Minimum average
such as your youth and
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or
a change in the reason for discharge, given your eight
disciplinary actions during an enlistment of less than three
Therefore, the Board concluded that no change to the
years.
discharge is warranted.
nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the
assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board also concluded that your eight
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07149-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your conduct and overall trait averages A minimum average mark of 3.0 On 23 February 1977 the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) that a summary court-martial concluded, by a three to two vote, conviction for an unauthorized absence of about 13 hours and the assignment of a 1.0 mark in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00322-11
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2011. Characterization of service is based, in part, on trait marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07199-98
A three-member panel of the Board.for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The punishment imposed was restriction for 30 On 23 November 1977 you received NJP paygrade E-3 and Your record further reflects that during the period from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00194-02
.reference to your application for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge and since your conduct given your three nonjudicial punishments, and overall traits averages were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05262-07
Correction of Naval considered your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, application on 15 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05539-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava! Records, Sitting im executive session, considered youn application on 23 January 2008 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, Board. Nevertheless, the Board found that these...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02635-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1972, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06662-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Minimum average marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.8 in overall traits were required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of your separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05735-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 31 May 1975. A minimum conduct mark of...