DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 3072-02
11 September 2002
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj
:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) OASD-HA/POD memo 8 Jun 01
(3) Subject ’s naval record
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show Petitioner was enrolled in the TRICARE Family Member Dental Plan
(TFMDP) and his dependents were entitled to dental care under the TFMDP.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
McPartlin, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
Docket No: 3072-02
a.
Petitioner was enrolled in the Tricare Family Member Dental Plan (FMDP) effective
TRICARE/United Concordia Dental Plan.
1 November 2000. Petitioner ’s dependents were entitled to dental coverage under this plan
from the
the period 1 November 2000 through 30 November 200 1.
United Concordia Dental Plan should file a supplemental voucher for payment for services
rendered.)
(NOTE: Premiums will be collected for
Once premiums have been paid
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
5.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
11 September 2002
CG | BCMR | Dental and Optical Benefits | 2002-148
2. the Coast Guard Personnel Command that The Board has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the provi- The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and applicable law: sions of 10 U.S.C. The Board agrees with the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard and the Commander of the preponderance of the evidence in the record indicates that by December 19, 2000, the applicant properly...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03030
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03030 INDEX CODE: 125.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed the difference between the single and family rate premium from United Concordia (Tricare Dental) for the total period of enrollment. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03030
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03030 INDEX CODE: 125.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed the difference between the single and family rate premium from United Concordia (Tricare Dental) for the total period of enrollment. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05700-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enrolled in the Family Dental Plan, Single option versus the Family option. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018883
The applicant requests, in effect, that the dates in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Report System (DEERS) be updated to reflect that his family members were eligible for dental care under the TRICARE Dental Plan (TDP) during the period 14 October 2004 until present. National Guard/Reserve family members are eligible for enrollment in the TDP even if their sponsor does not enroll. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03357-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The system failed Chief B was from November 30, 1999 through February d his daughter &WI@ in that no one informed them that upon Alisha reaching the age of w-s received 19,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099937C070208
The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: Leave and Earning Statements (LESs) for the period March 2000- February 2001, minus the month of June 2000; Divorce Decree, dated 25 October 1996; UCCI Letter with Reimbursement Check for Overpayment of Premiums, dated 10 June 2002; and UCCI Dental Premium Rate Change Notice, dated 4 February 2002. The evidence confirms the applicant was eligible to be enrolled in the TDP at the single enrollment rate of $7.63 per...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00508
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Feb 04, for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant continued to pay the premiums for dental coverage in good faith until the Defense Manpower Data Center updated his retirement status in the Defense On-Line Enrollment System, notified him of the error and refunded his paid premiums of $288.84. Exhibit...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069661C070402
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That she be reimbursed the family-rate dental care plan premiums she paid from her divorce in June 1999 to February 2001. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085412C070212
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...