Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-01
Original file (03147-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 3147-01
8 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5730 Pers
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

913Cl of 11 July 2001, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

N AVY PERSONNEL COMMAN

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 380550000

Y

D

5730
PERS-913Cl
11 Jul 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

T FOR ADVISORY OPINION

IN THE CASE OF

iTi'.,

Ref:

(a) COMNAVRESCRUITCOMINST  

1133.1D

Encl:

(1) BCNR File 3147-01

Enclosure (1) is forwarded with the following comments and

1.
recommendations:

(a) Regretfully we do not support HM3

-request  to be

HM3

authorized a temporary rate of HM2 in the Naval Reserve.

-enlisted under the provisions of the Advance Pay Grade

reference (a),

program,
verified by her original enlistment contract in her service
record and from residual files maintained by Commander, Naval
Reserve Recruiting Command.

as a temporary SN and a permanent HM3 as

Additional questions  

2.
(901) 874-4508 or DSN 882-4508.

may.be  directed to

PN

at

Director,
Administration Division

Naval Reserve Personnel



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00209-01

    Original file (00209-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member pane1 of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. We do not support Petty Officer nd that his record not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04208-01

    Original file (04208-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5730 PERS 9 13C 1 of 20 July 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06215-01

    Original file (06215-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Our letter, s not physically qualified and directed Naval not physically disk on 27 Jan 00, "inform member in writing of reference (d), stated Reference Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF b. In response to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04348-01

    Original file (04348-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HYT action until 31 December 1999. serbice, SK2 years of separation pay even i If eligible for RTB, SK2 retired pay at age 60.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06619-01

    Original file (06619-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations arid proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and injustice procediires applicable to the actdition, the Board considered the advisory Records, sitting in executive In 5730 Ser N 12 l/320 of 12 April 2002, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08388-00

    Original file (08388-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04470-06

    Original file (04470-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BNP memo 5730 Pers-4011 dtd 27 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02196-00

    Original file (02196-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 23 May 2000, and the memorandum for the record dated 14 February 2001, copies of which are attached. Former Reference (b) requires that promotion selection essage, as was promotion boards and The Per reference (c), a lieutenant who has at least...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00362-01

    Original file (00362-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 362-01 14 November 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title Ifnited States Code, section 10 of the 1552. Accordingly, the portion of your application regarding the Enlistment Bonus (EB) has been denied. D.C. 20370-5000 OFTHE NAVY IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D2/ 8 Nov 2001 OlU1343 MEMORANDUM FOR...