DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
Y
S
TRG
Docket No:
13 September 2002
3128-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record-and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 16 July 1985 at age 19 and
reported for four years of active duty on 22 November 1985.
record shows an unauthorized absence of about 2 hours on 2 March
1987, and no other incidents until 14 October 1989.
initial period of good service,
officer third class (MM3;
E-4).
you were advanced to petty
During this
The
On 20 November 1989 you were an
On 14 October 1989 you began a period of unauthorized absence
that lasted for about 33 days.
unauthorized absentee for about nine hours.
you received nonjudicial punishment for these two periods of
absence.
and a reduction in rate to firemen (E-3).
day period of unauthorized absence,
duty on 24 December 1989 with your service characterized as
honorable.
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The punishment imposed included restriction, extra duty
After making up the 33
you were released from active
At that time, you were not recommended for
On 22 November 1989
You state in your application that your unauthorized absence was
caused by pay problems and the fact that your wife was about to
become homeless.
You believe that you have matured and desire to
again serve in the military.
The Board noted the lengthy period of good service prior to the
nonjudicial punishment for the 33 day period of unauthorized
absence and your inability to overcome that disciplinary action
prior to your release from active duty.
concluded that a 33 day period of unauthorized absence was
sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment
code.
However, the Board
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06529-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 8 March 1983 at age 20. The Board concluded that the discharge was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07835-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. The Board believed that a record which included three nonjudicial punishments and a conviction by a special court-martial was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. In addition, regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals serving in pay grade E-2 on completion of an extended period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07447-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that a record which includes five nonjudicial punishments and the final adverse performance evaluation was sufficient to support the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06765-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2008. On 20 November 1986 you received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for a failure to go to your appointed place of duty and were reduced to petty officer second class. At that time, you had completed 17 years, 11 months and 10 days of active service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02698-05
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06283-01
were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of the general discharge given your record of misconduct, failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct, misconduct. The Board concluded that the general discharge by The Board found that these factors and your discharge by reason of Concerning the reenlistment code, the Board noted that regulations require the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01191-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 21 September 1989, administrative separation action was initiated by reason of misconduct for drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09391-97
The record also shows that during the period from 1 April 1986 to 30 November 1987 you received two consecutive adverse performance In the second evaluation for the period 1 April to evaluations. You were honorably discharged on 1 May 1990 However, you were assigned duties outside At that time you In reaching its decision the Board noted your disciplinary record, adverse performance evaluations and the fact that you elected separation prior to removal from quality control. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02132-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00604-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 September and 16 November 1988, you received NUP for additional periods of UA. On 17 November 1988, you were notified that administrative discharge procedures were initiated and that you would receive a reenlistment code of RE-4 for your pattern of misconduct upon your separation.