DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 3130-02
16 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application, together
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
with all material submitted in support
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 11 July 2000 at age 18.
2002 your company commander recommended separation because you
did not want to be in the Navy and were refusing to train.
was noted that you were unmotivated to the point that you would
do anything to get out.
that you wanted out of the Navy so you could
and
an entry level separation.
It
The company commander's superior stated
Subsequently, a recruit aptitude board recommended
prozac".
On 29 August
"get back on ritilin
On 1 September 2000 you were notified of separation processing by
reason of failure to adapt to the Naval environment. In
connection with this processing,
procedural rights.
directed an entry level separation by reason of erroneous
enlistment and you were so separated on 11 September 2000. At
that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
On 8 September 2000 the separation authority
you elected to waive your
Regulation allow for-the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is separated due to an erroneous enlistment.
The negative comments concerning your attitude and effort while
in recruit training certainly support a restrictive reenlistment
Since you have been treated no differently than others in
code.
your situation, the Board concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment
code was properly assigned.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
The Board noted that you were essentially processed for
"entry level performance and
separation by reason of
not "erroneous entry
However, the only authorized reenlistment code when entry level
performance and conduct is the reason for separation is an RE-4
reenlistment code.
separation, you should complete the enclosed application, DD Form
293, and send it to the Naval Discharge Review Board.
- other" as it appears on your DD Form 214.
conduct" and
If you desire a change in the reason for
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02949-01
You state but you asserted that you Subsequently, the Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals, discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. differently than others discharged under similar circumstances, the board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02015-01
In connection with this processing, you were processed for Subsequently, the You state in your application that you wanted to leave recruit training so that you could solve some personal problems. is separated prior to completing recruit training after being diagnosed with a personality disorder that interfered with the ability to perform military duties. no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00514-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. You were so discharged on 24 April 2000. Reglations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individual separated by reason erroneous enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08550-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found no evidence that the diagnosis of bipolar disorder was inco~rect. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00705-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08181-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06992-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01040-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09605-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 17 August 2000 you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 19 September 2000 you received a medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04097-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychologist believed that this condition would Thirteen Based on this recommendation, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.