Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02983-02
Original file (02983-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT  OF  THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

TRG
Docket No: 2983-02
13 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 June 1957 at age 17.
During your service, you received nonjudicial punishment on two
occasions and were convicted by a summary court-martial.
offenses were drunk and disorderly conduct, an unauthorized
absence of about eight hours,
having a rusty rifle   on guard mount.
You were released from
active duty on 10 June 1960 with your service characterized as
being under honorable conditions.
a general discharge at the end of your military obligation.

exceeding the liberty limits and

Subsequently, you were issued

Your

Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and
proficiency averages which are computed from marks assigned
during periodic evaluations.
Your conduct mark average was 3.4.
A minimum average mark of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time
of your separation for a fully honorable characterization of
service.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, limited
education and your contention that you have been a good citizen
for many years.

The Board found that these factors and

contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of
your discharge given your disciplinary record and failure to
achieve the required average mark in conduct.
concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and no change
is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

The Board

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03225-02

    Original file (03225-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your conduct marks average was 2.0. such as your prior honorable In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, service and your contention, in effect, that you have...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01433-02

    Original file (01433-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary materi'al considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. of 4.0 in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09014-07

    Original file (09014-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service on release from active...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08750-02

    Original file (08750-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01073-02

    Original file (01073-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00214-02

    Original file (00214-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board found that these factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service on release from active duty, given your disciplinary record and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04190-02

    Original file (04190-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06291-01

    Original file (06291-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board, in its review of your record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity, limited education, and low test The Board also considered your contention...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02437-02

    Original file (02437-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04371-02

    Original file (04371-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that you received four The offenses included unauthorized Thereafter, on 21 September 1979 you Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and proficiency averages, both of which are...