Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03046-02
Original file (03046-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No:
9 October 2002

3046-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 May 1978 at age 20. A
special court-martial convened on 27 February 1979 and convicted
you of an unauthorized absence of about six days, absence from
your appointed place of duty,
six instances of disobedience,
disrespect, resisting arrest, assault, and communicating a
threat.
The court sentenced you to reduction to pay grade E-l,
forfeiture of $200 pay per month for two months, confinement at
hard labor for two months and a bad conduct discharge.
Subsequently, you elected to waive your right to request
restoration to duty.
with an anxiety reaction.
leave, you were found to be competent to understand the bad
conduct discharge.
remained in that status until the bad conduct discharge was
issued on 30 November 1979.

While in confinement, you were diagnosed

However, prior to commencing appellate

You began appellate leave on 14 May 1979 and

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
contention, in effect, that the discharge was unfair because you
had a nervous breakdown.
The Board found that these factors and
contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of

such as your youth and your

your discharge given your conviction by court-martial of multiple
offenses.
The Board noted that after your court-martial that you
were diagnosed with an anxiety reaction, but you were found
competent to understand that you would receive a bad conduct
discharge.
issued and no change is warranted.

The Board concluded that the discharge was proper as

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05938-01

    Original file (05938-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00130-01

    Original file (00130-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. "I want out of the military service because On 16 July 1968 you received On 14 June You On 28 March 1969, the Naval Discharge Review Board considered your case and concluded that the original...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04912-02

    Original file (04912-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. It was recommended that you be processed On 8 May 1978 you received a On 2 June 1978 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of unsuitability due to your diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02269-02

    Original file (02269-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. You were convicted by general court-martial on 14 March 1955 of the offense of desertion, and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for one year and six months, total forfeiture of pay and allowances for that period, and to be discharged with a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04258-02

    Original file (04258-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. .Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03189-02

    Original file (03189-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures'applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard forfeiture of $413 per month for six paygrade E-l, and a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03162-02

    Original file (03162-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated and lengthy periods of unauthorized The Board-found that these factors and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00058-10

    Original file (00058-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. On 3 February 1956, you were convicted by general court martial (GCM) of assault with a dangerous weapon, insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer, threatening to kill and failure to obey a lawful order. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05796-10

    Original file (05796-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2011. On 14 June 1979, you received NUP for being disrespectful toward you a chief petty officer on two occasions, and failure to obey a written regulation. On 17 February 1983, after appellate review, you received the BCD.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00022-02

    Original file (00022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 30 September 1976 you were released from confinement and placed on appellate leave pending the review of your bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...