NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00895-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 7 March 2001 895-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy V Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the enlistment of 24 February 2000 is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00898-01
On 3 June 1983 an ADB recommended you be issued a general discharge by reason of Shortly thereafter, on 17 May After misconduct due to drug abuse. discharged by reason of misconduct normally receive discharges Accordingly, you were under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00905-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in‘executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, the Board found the evidence and materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repetitive misconduct,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00918-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for misbehavior as sentinel, failure to go to your appointed place of duty, punishment imposed was restriction and extra duty for 45 days and a $45 forfeiture of pay. On 13 June 1965 your commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00920-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 19 10 Pers 832 of 17...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00930-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BJG Docket No: 930-01 21 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ( Subj: LTCO REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USMCR Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00931-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. honorable discharge from the Marine Corps Reserve and were recommended for reenlistment. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in Accordingly, your application has been your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00935-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additiion, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00940-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show entitlement to the Montgomery G. I. (Petitioner) requested to be separated from the U. An SPD of JDF would indicate that her separation was involuntary and she would be entitled to at least 28 months of MGIB benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00944-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 944-01 7 March 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00945-01
A'three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings'of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00946-00
On 18 September 1972, based on a review of records from January and July 1972, the VA increased your rating to 30%. The Board carefully considered your contention that your condition should have been rated at 30% or higher by the Navy in 1963, but it was not persuaded that the condition was ratable in excess of 10% at the time of your discharge. The fact that the VA has rated your condition in excess of 10% disabling since 14 October 1970 was not considered probative of In this regard, it...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00949-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00951-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00952-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No: 952-01 a. Petitioner was authorized BAH for 12 January 2001. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00953-01
They substantially concur with the PERS-61 opinion at enclosure (2) in finding that the fitness report at issue should be corrected as requested. report of 3. Only the reporting senior who signed the original fitness report may submit supplementary material for file in the member ’s record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00954-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with adm'inistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Your allegations of error and mzterial submitted in support After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00955-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his Home of Record (HOR) was shown as enlistment documents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Exnicios, and Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00959-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. On 7 June 1994, while still serving as an SR, you were honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve with an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00962-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00963-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Such evidence would include statements from individuals who served with you on the PROTEUS and were also involved in these special operations, and who witnessed your being wounded in action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00966-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00967-01
be separated and requested retention in the Navy. On 22 September 2000 the separation authority directed an entry level separation and you were so separated on that same day. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00968-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAb’AL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No. 968-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. provisio,ns of Title 10, United A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00972-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00975-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your applicatiofi on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 1977 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00980-01
980-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicat:.on for correction of your A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Iof an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00982-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. master microfiche record indicates she elected Per reference A review b. Additional1 College Fund (NCF) explained to ETSN not enroll in the MGIB Program was correct. the member must be enrolled in the MGIB Program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00985-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00988-00
988-00 24 July 2000 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, the 1. son of a former officer of the United States Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his father's record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 5 November 1943 rather than being dismissed from the Marine Corps. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00990-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. serious offense of stealing from a Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00991-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00993-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to Overseas Station Allowance (OSA) at the rate for Atsugi, Japan vice Yokosuka, Japan. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 March 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00995-01
1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments Coniptroller Sihject’s naval record Genc~-al Decision B-235924.3 of 13 Mar 90 Pursuant to 1. filed enclosure corrected to show the provisions (I) with this 01‘ reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be I3oartl requesting, that his retirement grade was changed to Warrant Officer 1. Ik~~t~~ntwt~~r-y material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, ill,iustice on 27...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00997-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 997-01 27 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01011-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters, U.S. Marine Corps dated 28 February 2001, a copy of which is attached. With regard to the issue of your disability rating, the Board concurred with the rationale of the hearing panel of the Physical Evaluation Board which considered your case on 9 December 1998. 1011-00 Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on petition to correct his record to show t tired by reason of physical disability in the E-8 pay grade.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01013-01
On 6 October 1983 the discharge The Board concluded that the The Board noted your contentions that you received the Navy Unit In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, limited education, and the fact that it has been nearly 18 years since you were discharged. foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of nine NJPs. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01025-01
1025-01 28 June 2001 From: To: < Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. Her overall f. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01035-01
1035-01 20 July 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 18 July 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01036-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the discharge under other than honorable conditions issued on 2 December 1983. f. The commanding officer (CO) recommended a general discharge under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. That a copy of the Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01038-01
in-charge (OINC) recommended to the discharge authority that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation. of your scheduled active duty for training and had sufficient time to make arrangements for child care, but you did not make the unit aware of problems until after your missed a drill and the period of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01043-01
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 9 October The record reflects that you 1961 for four years at age 19. were advanced to CTSN (E-3) and served without incident until 21 February 1963 when a Royal Air Force (RAF) noncommissioned officer (NCO) made a statement to a criminal investigator alleging that on the evening of 12 February 1963, after both of you had been drinking, you made inappropriate advances toward him by putting your hand on his crotch and undoing his trousers...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01044-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. The petitioner NAVET enlisted via the PRISE III program to receive advancement to completion of "C" school training. automatical:.y, advanced to Petty The d. Per reference (c), the STAR program is only available to personnel on their first Navy enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01052-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 1052-00 1 June 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01052-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 27 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s record be corrected to show that he was transferred to the retired list on 4 January 1997, pursuant to 10 U.S. Code 1201, by reason of permanent disability, with a 10% disability rating. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01056-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 23 Mar 200 0 0~0212 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01060-01
A three-niember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01067-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 August 2001. In addition, it concluded that even if it were to be assumed, for the sake of argument, that your condition warranted a 30% rating at that time, and that your name was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List, the rating would have been reduced below 30% under criteria which came into effect during January 1998, and you would have been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01068-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your written statement in which you admitted to...