Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00972-01
Original file (00972-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
. 7 

.

* 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 972-01
21 November 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

. provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 16 November 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you served in the Navy from 3 to 22 April 1991, when you were
discharged by reason of fraudulent entry. You were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4,
to indicate that you were not eligible or recommended for reenlistment.

Your contentions to the effect that your recruiter told you to lie about your alleged exposure
to second-hand marijuana smoke, as well as your diagnosis of asthma, were considered
insufficient to warrant changing you reenlistment code, which was properly assigned.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.

.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01349-01

    Original file (01349-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TRG Docket No: 1349-01 11 July 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05212-01

    Original file (05212-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 15 November 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ’ Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01148-01

    Original file (01148-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 1148-01 28 June 2001 Dea r

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01987-01

    Original file (01987-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an honorable discharge on 13 March 1997. time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to In this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07936-01

    Original file (07936-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 7936-01 21 November 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for'correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. t- '7 _ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01

    Original file (00069-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04961-01

    Original file (04961-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a However, the Board concluded change in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06345-01

    Original file (06345-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. was not pregnant and now want to reenlist in the Navy. Subsequently, you found out she Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged based on a diagnosed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09403-02

    Original file (09403-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07925-00

    Original file (07925-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...