Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01044-01
Original file (01044-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF

 

THE NAVY

BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

2037(1-5100

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 1044-01
30 May 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 8 15 of 30 April 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon 

reqwzst.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

LPARTMENT OF 
INTEDRITY  

5720 

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

THli NAVY
DRIVE

MILLINDTOW  TN 

28055-0000

1160
PERS-815
30  Apr  01

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR COF.RECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

BCNR PETITION

ICO.,

Ref:

Encl:

SNM's  DD Form 149 dtd 29 Jan 01

(a) 
(b) MILPERSMAN   1133-060
(c) MILPERSMAN 1160-100
(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1.
petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of

a.

The petitioner reenlisted on
after one year eight months and   26 
naval service.
Class.

dalrs  of discharge from active
The petitioner discharged as a Petty Officer Third

31 March 2000 for four years

b.

The petitioner NAVET enlisted via the  

PRISE  III program

to receive advancement to  
completion of "C" school training.
not meet the requirements set in reference
the PRISE III program.

Petty.Officer  Second Class upon

However,

the petitioner did

(b) to be eligible for

C .

The requests to change his four years enlistment contract

to reflect six years via the benefits of the STAR program.
petitioner requests to be  
Officer Second Class upon completion of NAVIGATION MAINTENANCE.
PIPELINE SCHOOL NEC 14NM.

automatical:.y,  advanced to Petty

The

d.

Per reference (c),

the STAR program is only available to

personnel on their first Navy enlistment.
waiver available for advancement to  
program for non-first term personnel.

There is currently no

paygrade  E-5 via the STAR

In view of the above,

recommend petitioner's record remain as

2.
is.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by

3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
(1) is returned.

only.

Enclosure

enlistment

Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01

    Original file (01109-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01

    Original file (02263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05470-01

    Original file (05470-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum which is attached. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05650-01

    Original file (05650-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum attached. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY S720 PIRSOWWIL COMMAND INTLDRITY DRIVE YlLLlnDtOr TN 28015-0000 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Subj: Ref: N ICO SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 18 Jul 01 (a) (b) MILPERSMAN 1160-100 (c) MILPERSMAN 1510-02 0 Encl: (1) BCNR File In response to reference (a), 1. petitioner's request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01

    Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05735-01

    Original file (05735-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01

    Original file (04573-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02

    Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02

    Original file (07709-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...