NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00746-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TRG Docket No: 746-01 2 March 2001 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy " OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00747-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Gunnery Sergeant transferred to the Fleet Marine Corps (FMCR) on 31 December 2000 mandated by the provisions of (b), 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00747-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00752-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00754-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Neuschafer, and Ms. Davies, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00758-01
RECOMMENI)A ’I‘ION: I>ocket No: 758-01 Petitioner ’s naval That the Delayed Entry Program for the I’rogr;~m r;lting. AME 1~ (I)lII ’) corrcctctl. on 7 I~tII ’I’KS h~larc*I~ hIS(; recorcl \\~h~‘rc al,prol)ri;ttc, to show that the enlistment in 2000 is IIII~CI.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00764-00
Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure by the Fiscal Year requested that his record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected by the FY 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY Selection Board. d. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00765-00
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Legislated Educational Benefit Programs is determined by the member's initial entry onto active dut educational program available to SKC active duty on 18 June 1984 was the Veterans' Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). A review of SKC -record indicates he did not enroll in VEAP before the legislated deadlines and is not eligible...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00767-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATE6 MARINE CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-8 103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 2 5 JAN 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00768-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 03 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00772-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive erl-or and session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 17 April 2000, a copy of which is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00772-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 18 December 1991 after about ten years of prior active service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error war,ranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00779-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 JRE Docket No. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. and they were finalized on 19 August You accepted those You underwent psychiatric evaluation on 25 August 1998, the Physical Evaluation The Board found that on 9 July 1998, Board made preliminary findings that your bilateral...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00786-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00788-01
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC Memo 1910 Ser (3) Subject's naval record 814/1UOO33 of 12 Jul 01 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was discharged on 20 August 2000 vice on 18 August 2000. Beckett, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00789-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00791-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 17 October 1974 you were convicted by SCM of a 36 day period of unauthorized absence (UA).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00792-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 June 2001. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your condition should have been rated at 70% disabling when your name was removed from the TDRL, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00794-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 30 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 794-01 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-8 effective 16 June 1997. b. Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00800-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Notwithstanding the clinical recommendation for aortic valve in the absence of any contemporary ejection fraction or the disability rating options are still limited to 30% or Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF In summary, 3. functional impairment. time the Petitioner's TDRL status was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00803-00
Since the Board found no defect in your performance record, they had no basis to remove your failures by the FY 99 and 00 Line Lieutenant Commander Selection Boards. A review of the member’s headquarters record revealed three fitness reports for the period in question, All three fitness reports are signed by the member acknowledging the contents of each and his right to make a statement. For us to recommend relief, the petitioner has to show that either there is no rational support for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00803-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00804-01
Documentary material considered by the-Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. sentenced you to a $350 fine and a suspended license. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00806-00
opinion furnished by the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate for Military Law, Headquarters Marine Corps dated 13 April 2000, a copy of which is enclosed. On 29 June 1987, Petitioner was convicted by a special court-martial of failure to obey a lawful order, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, resisting apprehension, and escape from custody in violation of Articles He was awarded confinement for 4 months, 90, 92 and 95 UCMJ. forwarding the case for appellate review, and he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00810-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00824-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 20 March attached. reason other than a court-martial or nonjudicial punishment by a page 11 entry for assignment of conduct marks below 4.0; paragraph assignment of proficiency marks below 3.0.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00824-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be (BAH) for designated location of corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00825-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00828-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your requests for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00829-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2001. patella that caused him to be placed on limited patella, but it is only his complaint of The member testified Enclosure (1) 1 The member entered the hearing room walking with a very pronounced limp, favoring his right leg. He claimed his knee was sore walking into the formal However, the member was noted outside the formal The member explanation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00831-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error cr injustice. recommend th'a petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00837-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached In addition, the Board considered the advisory 852/369 of 2 May 2001, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00841-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the United States Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was retired vice being discharged under the provisions of the Special Separation Bonus (SSB) program. In 1999, he was provided with a corrected statement of service which shows 19 years, 11 months and 14 days...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00844-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 29 May 1992 for four years to The petitioner's EAOS at the time of continue active service. reference (c), from 21 months the petitioner the zone of did not reenlist on 09 September 1993. continues service to six years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00848-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, the 1. widow of a retired commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application late husband's record be corrected to show that he became entitled to retired pay at age 60 and made a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for her. d. In the four anniversary years beginning on 1 July 1949 Subject earned no further qualifying However, in the first...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00851-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2001. It does not appear that you advised the examining physicians of any conditions you thought rendered you unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00858-01
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the contents of enclosure following corrective action. Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00859-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 6 June 2001.. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable 'to the proceedings of this Board. materi.al considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00868-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade E3. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Chapman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 06 September 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00868-01
Pursuant to the provisions filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bartlett, Ms. Humberd, and Ms. Newman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00871-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) was established as the date the Petitioner signed the documents enrolling in the Officer Candidate Course (OCC) or the Platoon Leaders Course (PLC), whichever Program applied to the Petitioner. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00875-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge on 11 December...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00878-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2000. Accordingly, in the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was improper, and that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00878-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of chief warrant officer-3 (CWO-3) he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 CWO-3 Selection Board, vice the FY 2001 CWO-3 Selection Board. &rt in Section...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00880-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 880-01 15 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF jijiiiiiiiIiii0asainimimnestes. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00881-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1448 (d), states that the Secretary concerned shall pay an annuity under...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00889-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to payment of Basic Allowance for Quarters-DIFF (BAQ-DIFF). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Lightle, and allegations of error and injustice on 17 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00893-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 893-01 25 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E3 based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00894-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. RE-3G, as provided for in As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty, or that you were improperly assigned the RE-3G reenlistment code, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...