Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00920-01
Original file (00920-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 920-01
30 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

~Jnited States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 October 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable 
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 19 10 Pers 832 of 17 September
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

statute:s, regulations and policies.

 

Your allegations of error and injustice

2001, a copy of which

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

that. the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
It is regretted  
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

fol- a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

LLPARTMENT OF THE 
NAVY PERSONNEL   COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN  
38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

NAV\

1910
PERS-832
17 Sep 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)

Via 

:

BUPERS/BCNR COORDINATOR, PERS-OOZCB

CASE 

OF-

Ref:

(a) 

CNm3 7220 Ser

 

N130C3/01U1213  memo of 10 Aug 0

1

Encl

:

BCNR  File 

(1) 
(2) Petitioner
(3) 

SNt4’s  ltr'dtd 7 Jul 99

#00920-01
’s Service Recor

d

1.

As requested in reference (a), I reviewed former member

rpetition  and his microfiche service record,

enclosures (1) and (2) respectively, to determine if his
separation was
service record,
enclosure (3).
considered a voluntary separation.
was handled appropriately and his DD214 should not be altered.

propriately.
requested separation as indicated in

When a member requests to be separated, it is

Therefore, his separation

According to his

2.

This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for

Assistant
Favorable Enlisted Separations

Section Head,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00658-01

    Original file (00658-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. PERS- If 832 find the member ’s petition has merit, we have no objection to the removal of the performance evaluation in questio Head, Performance Evaluation Branch DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720 INTEDRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 5420 PERS-832C 26 Apr 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03017-01

    Original file (03017-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03043-01

    Original file (03043-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of documentation dated 22 May 1987 from the Department of Justice. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07644-00

    Original file (07644-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC dated 15 December 2000, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting removal of the remaining contested document, the Drug Disposition Recommendation dated 31 January 1981 (document 9-9). Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01323-01

    Original file (01323-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record including your medical record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. They noted that while block 28 (“Narrative Reason for Separation”) of your DD Form 2 14 does refer to “drug abuse (use), cocaine. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05051-01

    Original file (05051-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of a felony possession and distribution charge. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07309-98

    Original file (07309-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others who have been similarly detached, the Board finds no basis for removing the NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02873-08

    Original file (02873-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 8 May 2008, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner has provided no such evidence to support removal of the documents.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02186-01

    Original file (02186-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 85/461 of 12 June 2001, a copy of opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04747-01

    Original file (04747-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...