NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01069-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Pay Entry Base Date (PEBD) was established as the date the Petitioner signed the documents enrolling in the Officer Candidate Course (OCC) or the Platoon Leaders Course (PLC), whichever Program applied to the Petitioner. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Goldsmith, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01070-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01074-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 2001, a copy of which is attached. they were not present and cannot attest Statements from which would qualify him for the Purple Since there is no indication in the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01080-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Retirement Multiplier is 55 % . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Kastner, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01086-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your conviction special court-martial of a two-month period of UA which was terminated only by your apprehension. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01087-01
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in considered your application on Documentary regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 27 November 1995 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01088-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect that his naval record be corrected to show that he was assigned a reenlistment (RE) code more favorable than the RE-4 he received on 25 March 1999. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that on 25 March 1999, he was dischaarged by-reason of erroneous enlistment, and assigned a reenlistment code of RE-3P in lieu of the code of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01089-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01091-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Recommend disapproval of XXXXXXX BCNR request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01092-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01093-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his leave balance as of 1 October 2000 be credited with an additional 12 days of accrued leave to compensate him for 12 days of lost leave because his command administrators had improperly counseled him.. ’s 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01096-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01097-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bartlett, Beckett, and Mimer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01100-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct and on 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01104-01
Correction,of Naval A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. have the best reenlistment code authorized by regulations, and have been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of hardship, the Board could not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01105-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 1105-01 20 September 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01106-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2000. The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs awarded you a substantially higher combined rating, and your current dissatisfaction with the rating assigned by the PEB in 1987, were considered insufficient to warrant any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01106-01
1610 MMER/ PERB 9 FEB ?001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NRVAL RECORDS Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) - ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF LIEUTENANT. Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) Consequently, his statement that he could only comment on the "adverse mark" is viewed as being without merit. c. While the petitioner now objects to a two-week report, the fact is that at the time he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01107-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01108-00
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0 S -_ IN...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01115-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing the date of acceptance of his commission as a lieutenant commander, U. S. Naval Reserve from 14 June and 28 July 1999 to 1 June 1999, the day after he left active duty, and that he be administratively promoted to commander. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Morgan and Shy,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01117-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. imposed was a $600 forfeiture of pay, which was six months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, and reduction to The punishment suspended for paygrade E-l. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01118-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has removed the duplicate copy of your fitness report for 31 December 1986 to 26 May 1987 and modified this report, as you requested, by adding the reviewing officer's comments. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 February 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01119-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01120-01
From available information and the guidance delineated in the enclosure, authority acted appropriately in the revocation of the Joint Service Commendation Medal in the case of Staff Sergeant any Defense decoration for a or service may be revoked if it appears the awarding Since this is a Department of Defense awards issue, it is 2. recommended that this case be directed to that agency for an advisory opinion. Any Defense decoration for a distinguished act, achievement, or service may be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01125-01
Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 1 December 1995 to 15 November 1996 (copy at Tab A to consideratil3n for advancement to pay grade E-7. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Schultz, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 24 May 2001, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01130-01
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified your contested fitness report for 1 April 1999 to 31 March 2000 to reflect that you were the subject of commendatory material. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board does not find that this omission invalidates an otherwise completely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01134-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged by reason of physical disability. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Swarens and Whitener, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01134-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01137-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given all...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01141-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01142-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, McPartlin, and Ms. Newman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01148-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 1148-01 28 June 2001 Dea r
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01153-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01160-01
& A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01160-99
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 JRE Docket No: 1160-99 21 June 2000 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 May regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01167-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board further Further, the Board noted that although you The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service and your contention that your discharge was unjust because you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01168-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your frequent and lengthy periods of UA and your request for discharge to avoid trial for a lengthy period of UA. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01169-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01171-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01176-01
1171 (b) Board for Correction of Naval Record letter of 7 August 200 1 (1) BCNR File (2) Service record (3) Medical records (4) VA records Per your request for review of the subject response to reference documentation of the charges that led to non-judicial punishment was provided in this packet. ” As a result, the 1: 1 watch was discontinued, and the patient was returned to full duty with instruction to take the provider appointment. He also endorsed a history of at least two episodes of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01178-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he entitled to reimbursement for no more that what it would have cost the (HHGs) from Alaska, his Home of Record, to his government to move his household goods first duty station. On 12 May 2000 Petitioner executed the appropriate documents whereby he HHGs; voluntarily elected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01179-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-01
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-99
authoriz s been 344 days of became eligible for promotion to Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen 1993 selection message. selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his record. Head, Reserve Affairs Personnel Management Branch Reserve Affairs Division By direction r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA I7 LEJEUNE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01191-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 25 June 2001 1191-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01197-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01199-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.