DEPARTMENT OF
THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC
20370-5100
MEH: ddj
Docket No:
30 May 2001
935-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
additiion, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160
attached.
PERS 815 of 1 May 2001, a copy of which is
In
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error
or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
_ APARTMENT OF
THIE NAVY
PIRSOWWEL COMMAND
WAVY
5720
IWTSDRITY DRIVE
YlLLlnDTow
TN
28055-0000
1160
PERS-815
01 May 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 13
Feb 01
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) OPNAVINST
068/97
1160.6A
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner enlisted in the Navy on
16 April 1991 for
four years.
and received honorable discharge.
adjusted to 28 December 1990.
The petitioner had prior service in the U. S. Army
The petitioner's ADSD was
,
b.
The petitioner received
1atera.L conversion approval on 29
February 1996 to convert to the CM rating via successful
completion of CM
"A" school training
eEfective 14 April 1997.
C .
Reference (b) released on 26 March 1997 listed a zone "A"
CM(00013) rate at the time the
and "B" SRB entitlement for the
petitioner completed training.
d.
The petitioner requests to receive a zone "A" SRB
However,
entitlement upon the completion date of CM "A" school offered in
reference (b).
of eligibility on 27 December 1996.
"A" window is from 21 continuous months to six years of active
service.
including prior service in another
2.
the same.
he passed through the zone '"A" SRB window
Pier reference (c), the zone
bra:nch of armed services.
:oased upon the ADSD date
In view of the above,
SRB zones are
’s record remai
Additionally,
this petitioner
recommend
n
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
is returned.
Enclosure (1)
ead,
eenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07339-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner completed CT0 "A" school training in November 2000. for the Reference (b) provided a zone "B" SRB entitlement CTO(OOO0) rate: there...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Additionally, per reference (c), the zone e. The petitioner requests to backdate the three year reenlistment of 30 August 1999 to 26 April 1999 and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00844-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 29 May 1992 for four years to The petitioner's EAOS at the time of continue active service. reference (c), from 21 months the petitioner the zone of did not reenlist on 09 September 1993. continues service to six years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07561-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2001. The requests to backdate the reenlistment of 09 November 2000 and receive the zone "A" SRB entitlement 2000 to 26 July offered in reference (b). November 1997 for three years and received a zone "A" SRB entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03896-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03163-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) released on 10 Reference (c) released on 02 d. The petitioner requests to backdated the 15 February 2001 to 13 January 2001 and receive the zone "B" SRB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02927-01
the petitioner is not requesting SRB based on a However, d. Upon re-entry to active service, MEPS stations are tasked to review NAVET service members SRB eligibility for the present enlistment. The petitioner will be eligible to reenlist for a zone "A" "A" window of eligibility on 22 February However, the The member will Subj: BCNR PETITION ICO In view of the above, 2. remain as is. recommend the petitioner's record to This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for 3. the Board for...