Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00980-01
Original file (00980-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

NA’IAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

ELP
Docket No. 980-01
14 June 2001

This is in reference to your  
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

applicat:.on for correction of your

A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy
Records, sitting in executive session,, considered your
application on 12 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

al:.egations of error and

Your 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on  
years at age 19.
a period of 36 months in the Active Mariner Program.

You were ordered to active on 2 August 1988 for

117 August 1987 for eight

The examining psychiatrist found

Your record shows that you were admitted to a naval hospital for
evaluation on 27 February 1989.
that you had impulsively cut your wrist after reading a suicide
poem from your girlfriend   of one week.
similar gesture while in  
opportunity to stay in therapy and work on your issues, you
preferred to  
out" and go home to help your girlfriend.
were diagnosed with an unspecified personality disorder with
histrionic features.
you were considered a potential risk for harm to yourself and
others if retained.
recommended.

Although you were not currently suicidal,

Immediate separation processing was

You gave a history of a
Although you were given an

"AVV school.

"get 

You

On 19  April 1989 you were notified  
was being initiated by reason of convenience of the government
You were advised of
due to a diagnosed personality disorder.
You did not
your procedural rights and waived  
object to the discharge and the discharge authority directed a
general discharge.
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

You were so discharged on 28 April 1989 and

th;at administrative separation

tho,se rights.

Iof an RE-4 reenlistment code

Regulations authorize the assignment  
to an individual discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality
Although you supplied the Letters of reference and
disorder.
your statement explaining the circumstances which led to your
being hospitalized for observation  
have provided no medical evidence refuting the Navy's diagnosis
of a personality disorder.
ideation pose a potential risk for harm to themselves and others
if retained, the Board concluded the assigned reenlistment code
was proper and no change is warranted.

Since individuals with suicidal

anld subsequent discharge, you

The Board did not consider the characterization of your discharge
since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by
first applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board.
is authorized to change both the reason for discharge and the
However, it cannot change a
characterization of discharge.
reenlistment code.
that board.

Enclosed is a DD Form 293 used to apply to

That Board

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently,
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

when applying for a correction of an official naval

Enclosure

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01

    Original file (00151-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00574-01

    Original file (00574-01.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01

    Original file (03886-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04607-08

    Original file (04607-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 November 2004, you were counseled regarding deficiencies in your performance and conduct and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or administrative separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00532-02

    Original file (00532-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06296-01

    Original file (06296-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no The error or injustice in your assignment reenlistment code. to that board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01885-01

    Original file (01885-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    15 December 1998 and assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. You were honorably discharged on Incident to your The Board also noted your contentions that the medical incident was a transient The Board noted the letters of Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3P or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are discharged by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02

    Original file (07992-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10257-07

    Original file (10257-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 December 2004 at age 19. After review, the discharge authority...