Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05040
Original file (BC-2012-05040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05040 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his 
dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not given the option to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill 
benefits prior to his retirement. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired from active duty, effective 1 Oct 08, in 
the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5). 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of 
the Air Force which is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, indicating the applicant retired 
effective 1 Nov 07 [sic] and the program for the Transfer of 
Benefits started 1 Oct 08 [sic]. Since 38 USC, Chapter 33, 
Section 3319 (f)(1) states “an individual…may transfer such 
entitlement only while serving as a member of the armed forces 
when the transfer is executed,” denial is the only 
recommendation. There has been no injustice to the extent that 
the service member did not receive adequate counseling as 
required by law and DoD regulation. 

 

The Post-9/11 GI Bill, Chapter 33 became effective 1 Aug 09. 
Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, 


is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of 
service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 
benefits to their dependents. 

 

Service Secretaries were required, as of 22 Jun 09, to provide 
and document individual pre-separation or release from active 
duty counseling regarding these benefits. The Air Force issued 
AFGMI on 23 Jul 09, which required pre-separation counseling be 
documented on DD Form 2648. 

 

DoD developed a special website to facilitate the transfer of 
educational benefits. On 27 Jun 09, the website was operational 
for the purpose of accepting transfer of benefits applications. 
Both the DTM and AFI 36-2306 state the transfer must be made 
while the member is serving in the Armed Forces. Both documents 
were published on government-hosted websites prior to 1 Aug 09, 
the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT stated that his retirement date was 1 Nov 07; 
however, that is incorrect. His effective retirement date was 
1 Oct 08. They also stated that the TEB started 1 Oct 08 and 
that 38 USC and 3323 (b)(1) and (2) required the secretary to 
provide member with information on the Post 9/11 GI bill as 
specified in DoD regulations. The Post 9/11 bill was signed 
30 Jun 08 and he was still on active duty but never received a 
briefing on the benefits. He reiterates the bill was to be used 
as a retention tool and he was on active duty and retired after 
the bill was signed. He asserts that he would have delayed his 
retirement for a year or longer had he known about the program. 
Additionally, he asserts that he would have volunteered for 
deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan to extend his time and 
obtain the right to transfer the benefits to his children. He 
concludes that the Air Force was negligent for not briefing him 
as required by law on the Post 9/11 benefits prior to his 
retirement. 

 

A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 


3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, the applicant retired from active 
duty prior to the Tranfer of Benefits becoming effective on 
1 Aug 09 and, other than argument and conjecture, he has 
presented no evidence to indicate that he was somehow 
miscounseled by Air Force officials regarding his potential 
eligibility to transfer his Post-9/11 educational benefits or 
that he has been treated differently than others similarly 
situated who chose to retire prior to the effective date of the 
TEB program.. Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-05040 in Executive Session on 12 Aug 13, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Oct 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 Nov 12. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 12. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 24 Nov 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01574

    Original file (BC-2012-01574.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Air Force provided unfair and misleading information concerning Post 9-11 transferability by stating that enrolled members were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01391

    Original file (BC-2012-01391.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill prior to retirement; however, the transferability portion of the benefit had not been established at that time and believes for that reason he should be given an opportunity to complete this transfer. The applicant states that he applied for the 9/11 GI Bill right before he retired (no date of when this happened), but the transferability requirement for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01487

    Original file (BC 2014 01487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He then submitted another TEB and received an approved waiver of the TEB obligation end date, which allowed him to retire voluntarily and keep the TEB benefit. On 17 Nov 11, the RNT system shows the applicant made an additional request to change his retirement date to 1 Oct. “For those members eligible for retirement after 1 Aug 11, and on or before 1 Aug 12, three years of additional service from the date of request is required.” Based on his TAFMSD, his retirement date, and the date he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03178

    Original file (BC 2013 03178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election. In 2008, the Education Office did properly brief the applicant that Post-9/11 GI Bill can be used up to 15 years after separation/retirement; however, the Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05141

    Original file (BC 2013 05141.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05141 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00141

    Original file (BC-2012-00141.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Further, the letter he received from the DVA acknowledging his Post 9/11 application, dated 25 Jun 09, mentioned nothing about a transfer being required. Further, DPSIT notes the applicant did receive pre-separation counseling on 9 Oct 08 for educational benefits prior to his terminal leave in Jun 09. Therefore, we elect to resolve any doubt in this matter in behalf of the 3 Panel Chair Member Member applicant and recommend the records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00542

    Original file (BC-2013-00542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was advised by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) to request Transfer of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05053

    Original file (BC-2011-05053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post 9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post 9/11 benefits to their dependents On 18 Feb 11, the applicant acknowledged and electronically signed the Post...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01291

    Original file (BC-2010-01291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was provided incomplete and incorrect information about enrollment in the new Post 9/11 GI Bill and transferring his education benefits to his dependents. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant indicates that he was aware of the TEB’s requirement to transfer...