RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-5073 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to her dependents. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not provided any information on transferring educational benefits to her dependents. She was deployed from 2009 to 2010, and upon re-deployment 2010, she was notified that her last day on active duty would be 31 July 2012. She was not provided the option to extend on active duty. In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy her retirement order. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former Regular Air Force member who retired on 1 August 2012. According to the applicant’s DD Form 2648, Preseparation Counseling Checklist for Active Component (AC), Active Guard Reserve (AGR), Active Reserve (AR), Full Time Support (FTS), and Reserve Program Administrator (RPA) Service Members, dated 16 May 2012, she requested information regarding education benefits. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ ? AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence showing she was not properly counseled regarding criteria for transferring education benefits to her dependents. The applicant’s preseparation checklist reflects she requested information regarding education benefits. The checklist states service members should visit the GI Bill websites. The applicant has not provided any documentation regarding her deployments or her involuntary separation. Service members of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least six years of service on the date of election and agreed to serve (if applicable) a specified additional period from the date of election, may transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Benefits to their dependents. The transfer of such entitlements must be done while the service member is on active duty. The Air Force used internal media, internal communication tools, and external trade publications via the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) Commander and the Education and Training Sections at each installation to disseminate information regarding the transfer of education benefits to service members. The Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Military Services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the transferability feature. DoD developed a special website, hosted by Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to facilitate the transfer of educational benefits. The website system was operational on 27 June 2009 for the purpose of accepting transfer of benefits applications. The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 November 2012, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05073 in Executive Session on 12 August 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 October 2012, w/atch. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 2 November 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 November 2012. Panel Chair