AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04277
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04277 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 June 2012 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). IAW AFI 36-2905, paragraph 1.20.2.5, FAC documents FA results on a hard copy score sheet, signs the score sheet, and obtains members...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04283
His Report of Individual Counseling (RIC), dated 3 Aug 06, be removed from his records. The complete SGH evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIM recommends denying the applicants request to remove the RIC from his Personnel Information File (PIF) since the PIF became obsolete when the applicant separated from the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04286
On 9 Mar 00, the Secretary of the Air Force found the applicant unfit for continued military service and directed he be separated from active service for physical disability with a combined compensable disability rating of 10 percent. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04287
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made a mistake by not adding his wife to his military retirement account. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04291
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. There is no evidence to verify the applicant was recommended for or awarded the LOM. The LOM is awarded to service members of the Armed Forces of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to Navarre, Florida. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04301
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to have her 17 October 2011 FA removed from AFFMS. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 14 May 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04304
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04304 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable or medical discharge. The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and directed an UOTHC discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 2 April 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04305
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04305 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04312
The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 March 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 27 February 2013. BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR Chief Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04313
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04313 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE APPLICANT: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His deceased fathers military retired pay record be corrected to add 36 days of U.S. Army Reserve service and his mother receive all back pay and benefits resulting from the corrected military retired pay records. The Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04323
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04323 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant acknowledged her commanders intent, her right to legal counsel and to submit statements on her behalf. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04328
His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Elizabethtown, PA as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. EXAMINERS NOTE: The applicant states his HOR reflects Elizabethtown, CA; however, it was confirmed that his records reflect Elizabethtown, PA. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. ________________________________________________________________ THE...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04330
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On or about May 2009, he completed the application to transfer his benefits to his dependents. The Secretary of the Air Force determined the Air Force would offer the transfer of benefits feature. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04331
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for awards and decorations related to his service in the Republic of Vietnam, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04331 in Executive Session on 2 May 2013, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04335
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04335 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 1. He believes the USSOUTHCOM historical office might keep those records because of their importance...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04338
Therefore, while the Medical Consultant does find error in the failure to conduct the applicant's MEB and referral to a Physical Evaluation Board, the evidence does not support the final outcome of a medical retirement. The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 February 2013 for review...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04339
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04339 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). Should the Board determine the applicant has exhausted all avenues of administrative relief; the applicant has not provided official documentation verifying he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04341
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04341 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Career Status Bonus (CSB) election be authorized and changed from Eligible, but did not elect CSB to Eligible and elected CSB. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He applied for CSB by...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04351
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04351 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect that her diagnosis of asthma be removed, she be found fit for duty, removed from all restrictions, returned to duty, and allowed to reenter the military in the Nurse Corps as a Second Lieutenant. The applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04355
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04355 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be changed to a permanent retirement with a 100 percent disability rating. On 11 Jan 12, the discharge authority approved the applicants discharge under the provisions of AFI 36-3208. The MEB...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04359
AFBCMR BC-2012-04359 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04363
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code, narrative reason for discharge, and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2 be changed to allow her full entitlement to military benefits. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04364
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04364 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants General (Under Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04366
AFBCMR BC-2012-04366 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04370
As a result, the applicant and one other member were erroneously selected for promotion. Upon discovery of the error, the applicants erroneous promotion selection was removed and the eight members who were considered in the wrong AFSC were given supplemental promotion consideration in the 8F000 AFSC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He checked with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04377
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04377 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge) be changed to allow him reentry into military service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04378
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 7 Aug 07. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04382
AFBCMR BC-2012-04382 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04386
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant provided a copy of his Individual Flight Record with entries from 10 Feb 75 to 9 Apr 75. After a thorough...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04393
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04393 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Examiners Note: The applicant has not shown the characterization of his discharge was contrary to the provisions of AFR 39-17A (unfitness) (extract copy of applicable portion attached as Exhibit D)....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04397
On 18 Apr 11, the legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended discharge with an honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicants honorable discharge for unsatisfactory performance was consistent with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04398
Therefore, to preclude the possibility of an injustice to the applicant, we recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was exempt from the cardio components of the Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 28 Dec 10, 25 Mar 11, 23 Jun 11, and 30 Apr 12. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04401
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04401 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 26 April 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) score be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04402
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04402 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 32 days of advance leave she was charged while on leave in in Shreveport, LA be restored. The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04404
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04404 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to Honorable. On 16 Jun 54, the applicant received an Article 15 for failure to repair. On 23 Jun 54, the applicants commander recommended him for discharge based upon his conviction in civilian court. On 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04412
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04412 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased father be posthumously awarded the Bronze Star Medal. However, based on the documentation provided and the fact that the decedent is confirmed to have been a glider pilot assigned to the 77th Troop Carrier Squadron, 435th Troop...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04417
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04417 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Considered alone, we conclude the discharge proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the existing circumstances. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04426
She separated from the Regular Air Force effective 27 June 2011 and was appointed an officer in the USAFR effective 19 July 2011 (date of SecDef approval). The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicants military service record, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04428
In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided such wound necessitated treatment by a medical officer. Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be documented in the members medical and/or health record. Award of the Purple Heart may be made for wounds treated by a medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04429
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04429 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 14 September 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). Per AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, the abdominal circumference (AC) measurement should be taken three times and each measurement...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04435
His date of separation be adjusted to reflect he completed twenty years of total active duty. The applicant concurred with the IPEB findings and recommendation and waived his right to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB). The preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability processing or at the time of separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04444
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04444 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be advanced to the grade of major. Title 10 USC 8964, Higher grade after 30 years of service; warrant officers and enlisted members, allows members to be advanced to the highest grade satisfactorily held on active duty when their active duty time...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04445
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04448
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends approval of the request for adjustment to his R/R date, stating, in part, that the applicants Effective Date Strength Change Accountability (EDCSA), along with his R/R date should be established as 5 January 2007, 30 days from recruiter endorsement of the AF FM 1288, Application for Ready Reserve Assignment action on 5 December 2006. The Air Force Reserve office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04458
He was initially served a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing the FA, which was later rescinded when his commander became aware that he should not have participated in the contested FA. His FA on 22 Aug 12 was in effect until his commander invalidated the test on 5 Sep 12. While the applicant filed an IG complaint related to his 22 Aug 12 FA failure and was subsequently issued the contested LOC and UIF for becoming noncurrent, the fact that his contact with the IG, preceded the LOC and...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04460
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was eligible to receive ACP in FY12; however, the message authorizing ACP was not released until 24 Feb 12. On 11 Jun 12, AFBCMR sent the applicant the SAF/MRB Legal Advisory, dated 9 Apr 13, see Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PF recommends approval. He realized that there would be a delay in the FY11 [sic] ACP, but it would...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04462
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04462 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Re-entry (RE) code of 2C, (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04470
DPFFF states to preclude an injustice the applicants record should be corrected to show he elected child only SBP coverage based on full retired pay effective 1 March 2011. Therefore, we recommend that the records be corrected as indicated below. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that his DAUGHTER, is permanently...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04476
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04476 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) characterization of discharge be upgraded to honorable. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His discharge be upgraded to help him find suitable employment. ...