RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04445 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His diagnosis of cancer due to exposure from Agent Orange in a combat area warrants award of the PH Medal. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 15 July 1966. On 5 June 1971, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force and was credited with five years and three days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The PH Medal is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces who have been wounded, killed, or who have died or may hereafter die of wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States or opposing force as a result of an act of any such enemy or opposing armed force, an international terrorist attack or during military operations while serving as part of a peacekeeping force. A wound for which the award is made must have required treatment, not merely examination, by a medical officer. Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be documented in the Service member’s medical and/or health record. Award of the PH Medal may be made for wounds treated by a medical professional other than a medical officer, provided a medical officer includes a statement in the Service member’s medical record that the extent of the wounds were such that they would have required treatment by a medical officer if one had been available to treat them. However, Agent Orange is not an enemy action and injuries caused by it do not fulfill the criteria for award of the PH Medal. The PH Review Board disapproved the applicant’s request on 28 November 2012. Therefore, to grant the applicant relief would be contrary to the established eligibility criteria and could set precedence for other veterans in similar situations or medical diagnosis. AFPC/DPSID has verified the applicant’s entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal with four Bronze Stars (VSM w/4BSS) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) and corrected his records administratively. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant argues that Public Law 99-145 authorized the award of the PH Medal for wounds received as a result of friendly fire. Therefore, award of the PH Medal in his case is justified since Agent Orange could be considered as “Friendly Fire” and his treatments and surgeries are regarded to as wounds by doctors. A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we find no evidence which would lead us to believe the applicant’s injuries were a direct result of enemy action as required for award of the PH Medal. Moreover, we are not persuaded that his diagnosis of cancer due to exposure to herbicides in a combat theatre meets the definition of a wound received by friendly fire for the purposes of determining PH Medal entitlement. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The personal sacrifice the applicant has endured for his country is noted and our decision is not intended in any way to lessen the importance of his service; however, insufficient documentary evidence has been presented to warrant awarding him the PH Medal. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04445 in Executive Session on 4 June 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 September, 2012, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 January 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 January 2013. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 26 January 2013. Panel Chair