Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04359
Original file (BC-2012-04359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


AFBCMR BC-2012-04359

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR

SUBJECT:  

	Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air 
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our 
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice.  Therefore, we 
recommend that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to 
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 30 September 2009, he elected to transfer his Post 
9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents.

      Members of the Board considered this application on 5 March 2013.



		
		Panel Chair


Attachment:
Ltr, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 1 Oct 12



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802045

    Original file (9802045.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-02045 September 10, 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: records of the Department of the Air Force relating to e corrected to show that: a. w/Atch Ltr, HQ AFPC/DPAMP, dtd Aug 11, U V / U ~ /...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702356

    Original file (9702356.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Ltr, ANG/MPPU, dtd Mar 13, 1998, w/Atchs DEPARTMENT O F THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC - OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY 1 April 1998 MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM: SAFPC 1535 Command Drive EE Wing, 3d Floor Andrews AFF3, MD 20762-7002 SUBJECT: Correction Board Case of AFBCMR Docket Number 97-02356 This memorandum responds to your March 24,1998 request for a SAFPC opinion on subject case. Through no fault of the applicant, the reappointment application was not received at ANGMPPS in sufficient...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9801024

    Original file (9801024.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 024 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: E cords of the Department of the Air Force relatin , be corrected to show that on 9...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01269

    Original file (BC-2005-01269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFBCMR (Processing) BRENDA J. THOMAS Examiner Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records AFBCMR CUSTOMER SURVEY BOARD DECISION GRANT DENY TIMELINESS 1. If you made any written inquiries, were you provided a timely and accurate response? No c. Could be improved d. N/A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS The Record of Proceedings (ROP) contains a summary of your request, your contentions, the facts, Air Force evaluation, your rebuttal, if any, and the conclusion and recommendation by the Board.

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9400739

    Original file (9400739.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit G. Applicant's counsel submitted additional information on 16 May and 25 August 1998, requesting de novo consideration of applicant's request and amended applicant's requests (Exhibits H c AFBCMR 94-00739 and K). Counsel ' s numerous contentions regarding the Air Force's obligation to advise applicant of pending changes in legislation which would impact his eligibility to reenlist in the Regular Air Force are duly noted;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9802134

    Original file (9802134.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AETCI, dated 14 Apr 95, stated that prior service personnel enlisting as recruiters would retain the DOR held on their previous enlistment. On 30 Jan 96, HQ AFRSRSO released a PROMIS message correcting the policy on recruiter enlistees to coincide with the policy for other prior-service accessions (the revised AETCI 36-2002, published 1 Oct 97, reflects the change). Applicant provides copies of his enlistment order (SO 145-5) reflecting his enlistment DOR as 20 Jul95, an amendment to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03902

    Original file (BC-2007-03902.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS concurs with the ANG subject matter expert (SME) and recommends denial of the applicants request for participation point credit during the time he was involuntarily discharged. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800460

    Original file (9800460.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    V Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JUN 3 0 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00460 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT : Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00134

    Original file (BC-2006-00134.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he requests direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel with date of rank determined as if he had met the CY02A selection board and a return to active duty in the Air Force as soon as possible. We note that the applicant in his rebuttal provides counter arguments to those made against his direct promotion: (1) He believes his promotion to lieutenant colonel is the “next appropriate step” given the AFBCMR’s determination in his prior case he had been the victim of an error...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-00134

    Original file (BC-2006-00134.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he requests direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel with date of rank determined as if he had met the CY02A selection board and a return to active duty in the Air Force as soon as possible. We note that the applicant in his rebuttal provides counter arguments to those made against his direct promotion: (1) He believes his promotion to lieutenant colonel is the “next appropriate step” given the AFBCMR’s determination in his prior case he had been the victim of an error...