Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04298
Original file (BC-2012-04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04298 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Tucson, Arizona to 
Navarre, Florida. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

She is assigned to Korea and her family relocated to Navarre, 
Florida, so Florida became her permanent mailing/home address 
and the location where she will live after returning from Korea. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant serves on active duty in the grade of Senior 
Airman in the Regular Air Force. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence 
of an error or injustice. The Joint Federal Travel Regulations 
(JTFR) for Uniform Service Members states the HOR is the place 
recorded as the home of the individual when commissioned, 
appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active 
duty. The HOR is the member’s actual home upon entering the 
Service, and not a different place selected for the member’s 
convenience. The DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document 
Armed Forces of the United States, is the official source 
document for HOR. The applicant’s DD Form 4 reflects the 
applicant’s HOR where she resided prior to entering the Air 
Force as Tucson, Arizona. 


A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation, with attachment, 
is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04298 in Executive Session on 4 Jun 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-04298 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep 12. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 3 Oct 12, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Oct 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04037

    Original file (BC-2012-04037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her home of record (HOR) be changed to reflect an address in Florida (FL). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of this case; however, she has not provided sufficient evidence which would lead us to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00320

    Original file (BC 2014 00320.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00320 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD), and Item 7b, Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect College Station, Texas. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04350

    Original file (BC-2011-04350.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from New Jersey to Texas. DPSIPE states the member's initial DD Form 4 reflects Wrightstown, New Jersey as the city/state in which she lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout her military records as her HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01468

    Original file (BC 2014 01468.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Aug 00, the applicant’s initialed and signed his DD Form 4/1, Enlistment / Reenlistment Document, which identified 750 Kanoa St, Apr 104, Honolulu, Hawaii as his home of record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02852

    Original file (BC 2013 02852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to item 7(b) of her DD Form 213, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, her home of record at time of entry reflects “Anasco, PR.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02416

    Original file (BC 2014 02416.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. There is no error or injustice that would justify a change in the applicant’s HOR. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00605

    Original file (BC-2012-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00522

    Original file (BC 2013 00522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After reviewing the documentation presented and the applicant’s military personnel record, there is no evidence to warrant changing the applicant’s HOR. The applicant argues that his home of record (HOR), as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01266

    Original file (BC 2014 01266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01266 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect Columbus Ohio. In support of her request, she submits a letter of selection for the United States Air Force, dated 27 Jun 72 and an AF Form 941, Statement of Understanding (Delayed Enlistment Program) signed 18 Sep 72; which identifies Columbus Ohio as the place...