AFBCMR BC-2012-04382
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR
SUBJECT:
Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our
decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT, be corrected to reflect that her Fitness Assessment dated 21 February 2012,
be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
Members of the Board considered this application on 26 February 2013.
Panel Chair
Attachment:
Letter, AFPC/DPSIM dated 3 October 2012, w/atch
6
6
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02389
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 1 October 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). However, the FA test dated 16 February 2011, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that the assessment was unjust. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03148
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 November 2010 8 February 2011 13 October 2011 * 25 April 2012 24 July 2012 *Contested FA score. The DPSIM complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends he had been performing physical therapy and rehabilitation from a previous surgery during his FA on 25 Apr 12, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that his alleged medical condition precluded him from receiving a fair FA.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03125
AFBCMR BC-2012-03125 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03341
10 On 27 March 2012, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining a composite score of 62.80, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) indicating the applicants records should be corrected to reflect he was exempt from the cardio components of the contested FAs, which will result in him...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02827
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 December 2011 be removed from his records. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 14 December 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00574
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 May 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03505
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant contends his abdominal circumference measurements were inconsistent, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that he has been the victim of an error or injustice. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates an error or impropriety in the physical fitness test and subsequent fitness assessment score, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04898
On 5 May 2014, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) considered and denied the applicants request to remove the FA dated 14 February 2012 from the AFFMS. The board stated while they had determined there was clear evidence the applicant was miscounseled on what the score was to pass the fitness assessment, the FAAB had determined that it is the applicants responsibility to understand what the standards are for his age requirement. After a thorough review of the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01503
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-01503 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former member’s records be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | bc-2012-01306
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air AFBCMR BC-2012-01306 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former member’s records be...