RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04313
(DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE
APPLICANT:
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His deceased fathers military retired pay record be corrected
to add 36 days of U.S. Army Reserve service and his mother
receive all back pay and benefits resulting from the corrected
military retired pay records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His father originally enlisted in the U.S. Army Infantry
Enlisted Recruit Corps (INF-ERC) on 5 July 1950 and received an
honorable discharge on 10 August 1950. He enlisted in the U.S.
Air Force on 11 August 1950. His Air Force retirement order
does not reflect the period of his Army enlistment.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information submitted by the applicant reflects the decedent
retired from the Regular Air Force effective 11 July 1973 in the
grade of Senior Master Sergeant, E-8, and died on
1 September 2002.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIPV states in accordance with Title 10 U.S.C. 1405,
Years of Service, enlisted members did not receive credit for
their inactive reserve service for retirement pay until
5 October 1994. If the time were creditable, the decedent would
have been credited with membership points for his service and
would have been credited with 1 day of active duty.
The complete DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C.
DFAS-CL states at retirement, the decedent was credited with 22
years, 11 months and 20 days of service. Adding 36 Reserve days
to his service for BP (basic pay) would give him 23 years and 26
days for BP. Since he was already credited with over 22 years,
there would be no change for retired pay. The 36 Reserve days
would have equaled 1 day of active duty and would not change the
percentage of his retirement pay.
The complete DFAS-CL evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force advisories were mailed to the applicant
on 22 April 2013 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit E). To date, a response has not been received.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice After a review
of the evidence of record and the applicants complete
submission we believe that relief is warranted. The Board notes
that the Air Force office of primary responsibility and the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service state that based on the
applicants submission; it appears the decedent did serve 36
days in the Army Reserves prior to his enlistment in the Air
Force. Based on this evidence, we believe a change in his
record is warranted. However, since this correction does not
change his retired pay percentage, the applicants request for
back pay and benefits is not possible. Therefore, we recommend
his records be corrected as indicated below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to reflect that the DD
Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer
or Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 31 July 1973,
retirement, be amended in Item 30, Remarks, to reflect 36 days
of inactive Reserve service from 5 July 1950 through
10 August 1950.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 18 June 2013, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-04313 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Sep 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 16 Nov 12, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Message, DFAS-CL, dated 22 Mar 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Apr 13.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews NAF Washington, MD 20762
Dear:
Reference your application submitted under the provisions of AFI 36-2603 (Section 1552, 10
USC), AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-04313.
After careful consideration of your application and military records, the Board determined the
decedents military records should be corrected to show 36 days of inactive Reserve service from 5 July
1950 through 10 August 1950. The office responsible for making the correction will inform you when his
records have been changed.
After correction, the records will be reviewed to determine if you are entitled to any monetary
benefits as a result of the correction of records. This determination is made by the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS-IN), Indianapolis, Indiana, and involves the assembly and careful checking of
finance records. It may also be necessary for the DFAS-IN to communicate directly with you to obtain
additional information to ensure the proper settlement of your claim. Because of the number and
complexity of claims workload, you should expect some delay. We assure you, however, that every effort
will be made to conclude this matter at the earliest practical date.
Notwithstanding the above decision, the Board determined the evidence you presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice to warrant favorable consideration of the
remainder of your requests. Accordingly, the Board denied these portions of your application.
BY DIRECTION OF THE PANEL CHAIR
Chief Examiner
Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records
Attachments:
1. Record of Board Proceedings
2. Directive
cc: DFAS-IN
AFBCMR BC-2012-04313
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States
Code it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected
to reflect that the DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or
Discharge, issued in conjunction with his 31 July 1973, retirement, be and hereby is, amended in
Item 30, Remarks, to reflect 36 days of inactive Reserve service from 5 July 1950 through 10
August 1950..
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
4
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03418
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03418 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His total active service be changed to reflect 20 years for the purpose of receiving Concurrent Retirement and Disability Payments (CRDP). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02752
The member did not request coverage for his former spouse be terminated and the fact that SBP premiums were deducted from his retired pay for over three years following their divorce are indicative of his intent to maintain the applicant as the eligible SBP beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02752
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPSIAR recommends the member's record be corrected to reflect on 10 Apr 2009, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. There is no evidence of Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, we agree with AFPC/DPSIARs recommendation that the members records should be corrected to reflect that he made a...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01193
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01193 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with 25 years, 7 months and 16 days of creditable service for pay purposes as reflected on his DD form 214 and retirement order. Accordingly, we recommend the records be corrected as indicated below. The following documentary evidence was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04626
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends approval, stating, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedent's record be corrected to reflect on 1 Feb 94, he elected to change SBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary. Considering the applicant failed to execute a deemed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05575
Her husbands records be corrected to show that he was on active duty in the Army from 21 Apr 52 to 29 Jan 55. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial of the applicants request to correct the decedents service dates. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03821
DFAS records reflect the decedent elected maximum child only SBP coverage prior to his 1 Sep 89 retirement. Records further contain an annotation that the applicant concurred with the members SBP election prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05614
There is no evidence of Air Force error in this case and absent a competing claimant, DPFFF recommends the decedents record be corrected to reflect that on 1 Jul 87, he elected to change RCSBP spouse to former spouse coverage based on full retired pay, naming the applicant as the eligible beneficiary. SBP premiums were deducted from the decedents retired pay until his 28 Jun 11 death. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00704
He submitted DD Form 1882, for former spouse and child coverage; however, DFAS-CL did not honor the election because it was not received until after the one-year eligibility period. However, while the applicant contends the election for former spouse coverage was made within the required time, no evidence has been provided, to our satisfaction, that she or the deceased former member submitted a valid former spouse election during the first year following their divorce. THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03482
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) stated that in order to receive the SBP benefit they only needed to be married for 10 years, the former spouse had to be deceased and she had to pay an $18,496.42 debt. The applicant was advised that upon providing these documents, her SBP account would be established and all retroactive pay would be issued. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or...