Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02055
Original file (BC-2012-02055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02055 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her records be corrected to remove her break in service from 2006 
through 2011, and reflect she entered the Air Force Reserve on 
4 October 2006. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her intention after receiving approval of her Air Force Reserve 
(AFR) commission was to maintain her commission as evidenced by 
her application to the Air National Guard and the AFR. However, 
she was converted to a regular commission and discharged. She 
was not provided any explanation as to the ramifications of being 
discharged. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in 
the grade of captain (O-3). 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the 
Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

ARPC/DPA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice. The applicant was a Reserve officer 
serving on extended active duty and became a regular active 
officer in accordance with the 2005 National Defense 
Authorization Act. On 3 Oct 06, she was discharged from the 
active duty, and from 19 Jun 06 through 12 Jun 07 tried to secure 
a position as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA), but was 


not successful. The applicant did not have a military service 
obligation. The applicant was approved for an Air Force Reserve 
commission on the 13 Sep 06 Scroll, but never took the oath of 
office, which is a required step to accept the appointment as an 
officer transition from Regular Active to Reserve. Since the 
applicant did not obtain a position, or take an oath of office to 
accept the commission, and her military service obligation 
expired, she was discharged from the Air Force. Therefore, the 
applicant’s break in service was the result of her being 
discharged due her military service obligation and no Oath of 
Office being administered for the Air Force Reserve 

 

ARPC/DPA complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 7 Aug 12, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 


newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02055 in Executive Session on 20 Feb 13, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 Panel Chair 

 Member 

 Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 May 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPA, dated 16 Jul 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Aug 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02316

    Original file (BC 2014 02316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, she resigned her commission effective 10 Mar 12 and was separated with a narrative reason for separation of “Pregnancy or Childbirth.” According to ARPC IMT 92, Appointment Order, Reserve Order PC- 01117 dated 9 Jul 12, she was appointed in the IRR, Category E, with date of appointment and assignment of 29 May 12. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant’s request to reflect no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01741

    Original file (BC 2014 01741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to the Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval in regards to adjusting the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02244

    Original file (BC 2014 02244.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02244 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of separation (DOS) be changed to 9 Sep 13, rather than 23 Jul 13, to eliminate a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03235

    Original file (BC-2007-03235.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    OSD General Council determined the appointment date is the date SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03138

    Original file (BC 2014 03138.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03138 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of separation (DOS) be changed to 30 Jul 13, rather than 17 Jul 13, to eliminate a break in service. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Through no fault of her own, she was not scrolled for appointment as a reserve officer in time to prevent a break in service when she transferred from the Regular Air Force to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04007

    Original file (BC 2013 04007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04007 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service dates be adjusted to remove her break in service. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Officers with a regular commission cannot be gained into the United States Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02522

    Original file (BC 2014 02522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant's request to reflect no break in service. Due to a delay in processing of the 21 Jan 13 scroll at Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) level, which was created by the In-Service Recruiter's late submission, the applicant incurred a break in service between applicant's DOS and appointment date into the Air Force Reserve. The office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel (OSD/GC) determined the appointment date is the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00385

    Original file (BC-2006-00385.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00385 INDEX CODE: 102.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her corrected Reserve appointment date of 1 Apr 87 be changed to 6 Apr 93. She was appointed as a Reserve of the Air Force in the grade of captain with a promotion service date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02898

    Original file (BC-2012-02898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She transferred to the Air Force Reserve effective 29 May 2012; the date her appointment was approved by the Secretary of Defense (SecDef). The General Counsel determined the appointment date is the date the SecDef approved the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03560

    Original file (BC 2013 03560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends approval of the applicant's request to reflect no break in service. The office of the Secretary of Defense General Counsel (OSD/GC) determined the appointment date is the date the SECDEF approves the appointment or the date the oath was administered, whichever is later. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...