Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02040
Original file (BC-2012-02040.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 
DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-02040 
COUNSEL:  NONE 
HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

IN THE MATTER OF: 
   
   
 
______________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 
 
His  Reenlistment  Eligibility  (RE)  code  2C,  which  denotes 
"Involuntarily  separated  with  an  honorable  discharge;  or  entry 
level  separation  without  characterization  of  service,"  be 
changed to an RE code of 1 to allow reentry in the military. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 
 
It has been almost three years since his separation and because 
it  is  not  possible  to  rejoin  the  Air  Force,  he  would  like 
nothing more than the opportunity to join another branch of the 
military.    Although  he  was  close,  he  did  not  make  the  minimum 
passing score on his Career Development Course (CDC).  This was 
a  surprise  to  his  superiors  and  his  fellow  airmen  because  he 
performed all of his duties at an above average level. 
 
He  struggled  with  the  written  and  book  assignments  during 
technical school and he was advised to apply for a CDC waiver, 
which  was  denied  because  the  CDC  test  is  crucial  to  career 
advancement. 
 
At  the  time  he  felt  so  defeated  that  he  did  not  fight  to  find 
alternatives to stay in the military.  He believes his time away 
has  helped  him  regroup,  grow,  and  find  a  career  field  that 
compliments his strengths. 
 
After  contacting  each  branch  of  the  military  he  was  informed 
that waivers were not available for his RE code. 
 
Most  airmen  in  his  situation  would  have  received  a  general 
discharge.  However, due to his dedication and good character he 
was rewarded with an honorable discharge. 
 
In support of his request the applicant provides a copy of his 
DD  Form  214,  Certificate  of  Release  or  Discharge  from  Active 
Duty. 
 

 

 

 

2

 
The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachment,  is  at 
Exhibit A. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
STATEMENT OF FACTS: 
 
On 10 Jul 2007, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. 
 
On 15 Sep 2009, the applicant received an involuntary discharge 
with an honorable character of service after serving two years, 
two months, and six days of active service.  He received an RE 
code  of  2C  and  a  separation  code  of  JHJ,  which  denotes, 
“Unsatisfactory Performance.”  
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
HQ  AFPC/DPSOA  recommends  denial  of  changing  the  applicant’s  RE 
code.    DPSOA  states  his  RE  code  of  2C  is  required  per  AFI  36-
2606,  Reenlistments  in  the  USAF,  based  on  his  involuntary 
discharge with an honorable character of service.  The applicant 
does not provide proof of an error or injustice in reference to 
his RE code.  He states most airmen in the same situation would 
have received a general discharge, but because of his dedication 
and  good  character  he  was  awarded  an  honorable  discharge.  
Conversely,  everyone  in  his  situation  receives  an  honorable 
discharge  unless  there  were  misconduct  issues  in  addition  to 
Career Development Course failure. 
 
If  a  military  recruiter  believes  he  is  otherwise  eligible  and 
wants to enlist the applicant, a waiver of the RE code 2C would 
be appropriate. 
 
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 
 
On 2 Jul 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 

 

2

 
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 
 
1.  The  applicant  has  exhausted  all  remedies  provided  by 
existing law or regulations. 
 
2.  The application was timely filed. 
 
3.  Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  The applicant should 
be  aware  that  RE  code  2C  is  a  code  that  may  be  waived  for  a 
prior  service  enlistment.    However,  the  decision  as  to  whether 
or not a waiver is approved is based on the needs of the service 
to which he applies.  Therefore, in view of the above and in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis 
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 
 
The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not 
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that 
the  application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and 
that  the  application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 
 
________________________________________________________________ 
 
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-02040  in  Executive  Session  on  18  Oct  2012,  under  the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 
 
 
 
 

, Chair 
, Member 
, Member 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

4

 
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02040: 
 
    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 May 2012, w/atch. 
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 25 Jun 2012. 
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Jul 2012. 
 
 
 
 
 
                                   
                                   Chair 
 
                                                                                     

 

4



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01119

    Original file (BC-2012-01119.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant concurred with his supervisor’s recommendation and stated that he would rather separate from the Air Force instead of retraining. On 16 Jan 09, the applicant received a referral enlisted performance report (EPR), for violations of Article 86, UCMJ, failing to report to duty at the prescribed time and twice failing his CDC EOC exam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01119 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02040

    Original file (BC 2013 02040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02040 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry Code 3A, which denotes “Failure to Complete Course of Instruction,” be changed to 1A, which denotes “Ineligible to Reenlist, but Condition Waived,” to allow reenlistment in the Armed Forces. On 22 Mar 2013, the applicant was notified by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01996

    Original file (BC-2010-01996.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided no facts warranting a change to her separation code or narrative reason for separation. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-03296

    Original file (BC-2012-03296.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Air Force personnel “confirmed” that he would receive a medical discharge within six months and rejoin the Air Force. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the applicant be corrected to show that he was discharged on 27 February...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04281

    Original file (BC 2014 04281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 Sep 12, he was discharged with a RE code of 2C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his RE code to the 1# series. On 25 Sep 12, the 37th Training Group Commander (37 TRG) directed he be discharged with an ELS for “reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force standards of conduct and duty performance.” AFI 36-2606, chapter 5 states not to separate airmen in the RE code 1# series except RE code “1J” which denotes...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03076

    Original file (BC-2007-03076.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03076 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2K, "First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP" to a code that permits his return to military service. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-03076

    Original file (BC-2006-03076.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03076 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from 2K, "First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP" to a code that permits his return to military service. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351

    Original file (BC-2012-00351.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00168

    Original file (BC-2010-00168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00168 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE code) be changed from “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) to a code that will allow him to reenter the Air Force. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02629

    Original file (BC 2014 02629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02629 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a “1” RE code series that would allow him to reenlist. However, HAF/A1P is postured to reevaluate those Airmen who were affected by entry level separation for failing academically between fiscal years...