Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02174
Original file (BC-2012-02174.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02174 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 23 Feb 2012, and 27 Feb 2012, 
be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System 
(AFFMS). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He has a condition that was not optimized medically before his 
failed FA. He is presently under medical care and will have the 
condition re-evaluated prior to his next scheduled test. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of a 
Medical Provider Form, VA Form 10-5345, Request and 
Authorization to Release Medical Records or Health Information; 
AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification 
Status, and extracts from his medical records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt, E-5). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states on 6 Jun 2012, a 
memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional 
documentation - specifically, a memorandum from his medical 
provider explaining his condition. The member did not provide 
the requested documentation. 

 

 


The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 17 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
C). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 15 Jan 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket number 
BC-2012-02174 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 7 Sep 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Sep 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05468

    Original file (BC 2012 05468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A commander can only recommend the removal of a fitness score when a member is unable to complete the FA due to a medical condition which is validated by a medical provider. In this case, after the applicant sustained his injury, there is no indication a medical provider exempted him from any components of the FA or that his commander invalidated the test. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364

    Original file (BC-2012-02364.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 03195

    Original file (BC 2012 03195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03195 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 30 Sep 11 and 23 Feb 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends partial approval,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00219

    Original file (BC-2013-00219.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides a letter from his medical provider. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03485

    Original file (BC 2012 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, because the failed FAs resulted in the applicant receiving a referral EPR and cancellation of his promotion, to the grade of technical sergeant, we recommend the referral EPR for the period of 29 Feb 2012 to 11 Jul 2012 be declared void and removed from his records and that his promotion to the grade of technical sergeant be reinstated with a date of rank and effective date of 1 Sep 2012. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSID, dated 19 Sep 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 29...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04950

    Original file (BC-2012-04950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04950 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessments dated 29 Jun 12 and 27 Sep 12 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05327

    Original file (BC 2012 05327.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Unable to complete electronic profile at this time but currently in process.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. While we note the comments from AFPC/DPSIM indicating the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762

    Original file (BC 2013 01762.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360

    Original file (BC 2013 01360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to “Insufficient evidence to support contention.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02001

    Original file (BC 2013 02001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02001 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 14 Sep 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). In the letter he expresses his opinion, explaining how his medical condition and pride of admitting his physical...