RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04978 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His official records be corrected to show he did not make an election for “spouse and children” with immediate coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). 2. His automatic deductions for RCSBP payments stop, and he receive back remittance of all RCSBP payments he has made since his retirement in 2010. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not make an election for “spouse and children” with immediate coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant was notified of his eligibility to participate in the RCSBP on 20 Sep 91, but he made no election. Therefore, per U.S.C. Title 10 § 1448, he was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Decline to make an election until Age 60,” effective 10 Jan 92. The applicant was afforded an opportunity to upgrade his election when Congress declared that 1 Mar 99 through 29 Feb 00 was an Open Enrollment Season. He took advantage of this opportunity by making an election for “Immediate Annuity” for “spouse and children” based on full retirement pay. Both he and his wife signed the DD Form 2656-3, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) Open Enrollment Election, on 25 Jan 00. He clearly elected to participate in RCSBP as prescribed by Public Law 105-261, Section 642, dated 17 Oct 98, and his request should therefore be denied. The complete ARPC/DPTT evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Feb 12 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04978 in Executive Session on 15 Aug 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 11. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 2 Feb 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Feb 12. Panel Chair