RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02528
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility status be changed from “Ineligible” to “Eligible” so he can reenlist in the Air Force Reserve.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The military made an error when they discharged him when he had requested to be transferred to inactive status. He experienced some personal problems that prevented him from attending monthly Unit Training Assemblies (UTA). The Air Force Reserve was a very important part of his life and he would like the opportunity to continue his contract.
In support of his request, the applicant provides an expanded statement and a copy of the background investigation summary of findings related to his security clearance.
The applicant’s complete submission, including the attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 30 Sep 02 for a period of six years and was progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4), effective and with a date of rank of 30 Jun 03.
On 3 Feb 06, the applicant’s commander notified him of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force Reserve for unsatisfactory participation. The applicant did not acknowledge receipt of the action as the letter of notification (LON) was returned by the Postal Service as undeliverable.
On 11 May 08, the case file was found to be legally sufficient, contingent on the unit curing the lack of documentation showing the applicant received notice of the specific basis and evidence for his discharge. Specifically, the LON noted an attachment, “Statement of Reasons,” describing the reasons for the action; however, said attachment was not in the case file. The legal review noted the discrepancy as a procedural and substantive error, but indicated it was curable, provided the unit supply a statement from an official directly involved in mailing the LON to the applicant with factual knowledge the Statement of Reasons and supporting documents were attached to the LON.
On 28 May 08, the discharge authority approved the commander’s recommendation and directed the applicant’s discharge. On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.”
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible” reported on the discharge order is in fact accurate. It is also important to note this eligibility status, in and of itself, does not preclude the applicant’s future service in the Air Force Reserve. Based on the conditions of his separation, the applicant is eligible to pursue a waiver, provided he is otherwise qualified for service. However, his accession into the Air Force Reserve would be contingent, in part, on the gaining organization’s willingness to support such a waiver.
A complete copy of the AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Oct 10 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting a change to the applicant’s reenlistment eligibility status. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note the applicant may be eligible for enlistment in the Air National Guard or Air Force Reserve with a waiver, based on the needs of the service and provided he is otherwise qualified. Therefore, in the absence of evidence his eligibility factor of “Ineligible,” issued in conjunction with his General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, was erroneously assigned or inaccurately reflected the circumstances of his separation, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
4. The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-02528 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Jun 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 10 Sep 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 10.
XXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC10-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02528
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS On 5 Jun 08, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge for Unsatisfactory Participation, effective 28 May 08, with a Reenlistment eligibility status of “Ineligible.” The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-01641
His records be corrected to show his Retention/Retirement (R/R) year (11 Aug 06 through 10 Aug 07) was a satisfactory year of Federal service. A complete copy of the AFRC/A1K evaluation is at Exhibit C. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe the applicant has raised sufficient doubt as to the circumstances surrounding the postponement of his Annual Training period.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04052
He be credited with the time remaining to secure 20 years of active duty service and a Regular Air Force retirement, or he be recalled to active duty status to allow him to receive a Regular Air Force retirement. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel notes that the applicant concurs with the recommendation to grant the requested relief and reaffirms the appropriate relief is to grant the applicant constructive service credit from the date of removal from active duty to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00401
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00401 IN THE MATTER OF: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility status of "Ineligible" be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01434
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-01434 in Executive Session on 13 Sep 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member Exhibit A. DD Form 149,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02444
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) which are included at Exhibits C, D, and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends the applicants record be corrected to reflect he requested and received a reserve commission and transferred to the IRR when he separated from active duty. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. ARPC/DPA recommends approval,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00326
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00326 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was transferred to the retired reserve on 18 Nov 11 rather than being honorably discharged for drug abuse. On 11 and 14 Apr 11, an administrative discharge board (ADB) was convened to determine whether or not the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01457
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01457 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted a waiver for being twice deferred for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5) while on Active duty so he may transfer to the Air Force Reserve (AFR). Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice with regards to the applicants request for a...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...