RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 7 Jul 11 Fitness Assessment (FA) be changed to exempt or removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to a preexisting leg injury he was unable to successfully complete the FA. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of an AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, and two AF Forms 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). On 24 Jan 11, the applicant’s profile was updated to reflect he can complete the FA at his own pace without pain. On 7 Jul 11, the applicant participated in the contested FA and received the 27.10 points for cardio, 14.14 for abdominal circumference, 8.30 for pushups, and 5.50 for sit ups, with an overall score of 55.30. The minimum passing score for an FA is 75.00. AF Form 108, dated 20 Sep 11, reflects the applicant had a medical condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score. On 28 Sep 11, the applicant’s physical profile serial report was updated to reflect he was exempt from the 1.5 mile run portion of the FA. The AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, Chapter 2, paragraph 2.2.2.2. states Alternative Aerobic Test: Members not medically cleared to complete the 1.5-mile run will be assessed by the 1.0-mile walk, unless otherwise exempted. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends the cardio component of his 7 Jul 11 FA be updated to reflect he was exempt in the AFFMS noting the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, indicates the applicant had a preexisting condition which precluded him from achieving a passing fitness score; and the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, exempted the applicant from participating in the 1.5 mile run of the fitness assessment. The complete AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Mar 12, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case. The recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) is duly noted; however, we are not persuaded the applicant is the victim of an error or injustice. While the applicant contends his leg condition precluded him from successfully completing the contested FA, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to conclude that his purported injury precluded him from receiving a fair FA. In this respect, we note that AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, indicates that a service member who is cleared medically from completing the 1.5-mile run can, as an alternative, complete that component of the FA with a 1.0 mile walk. In view of this, and noting there was no documentation located or provided that indicates the applicant was unable to complete 1.0 mile walk as an alternative for the 1.5-mile run, we are not convinced the applicant is the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04970 in Executive Session on 26 Jul 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Dec 11, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Military Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Feb 12, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Mar 12. Panel Chair