RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02746
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be credited with one (1) additional point for the Retirement
Year Ending (RYE) 18 May 03.
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
During this time frame, he was transferring from an Air Force
Reserve unit to the Air National Guard (ANG) after being
released as a part of the Stop Loss initiative. He believes he
has been the victim of an injustice because he was not allowed
to transfer from the Air Force Reserve unit to the ANG unit when
he moved.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of a
computer printout, Service History, dated 18 Jul 11 and his
DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Force of the
United States, dated 1 Mar 03.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
During the RYE of 18 May 03, the applicant was credited with
1 active duty point, 33 inactive duty training points, and
15 membership points, totaling 49 points.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial stating, in part, the documentation
provided did not reflect an error or injustice. The applicant
was asked to provide further documentation; however, he did not
respond.
The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 18 Nov 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the National Guard Bureau office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. in
addition, the NGB/A1PS requested the applicant provide
additional documentation to substantiate his appeal; however he
did not respond. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-02746 in Executive Session on 10 April 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Jul 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 10 Nov 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Nov 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00849
Further, AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, states, separate or discharge an ANG member who is not qualified or eligible for worldwide deployment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02768
After being successful in reenlisting in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR), he subsequently transferred back to his former unit with sufficient retainability for promotion; however, he was still not recommended for promotion. 2) His unit commander took him back on the basis that he would deploy and not be at the unit. However, since he was a member of the Air Force Reserve, the squadron commander of the unit he was assigned to (not the TDY commander) could have recommended him...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM). AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PP recommends denial of the applicants request for active duty service credit. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2007-03902
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS concurs with the ANG subject matter expert (SME) and recommends denial of the applicants request for participation point credit during the time he was involuntarily discharged. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02524
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial, they found no error or injustice nor did the applicant provide any evidence to support his claim. The applicant did not provide any documentation to show a professional opinion of a qualified military medical personnel and evaluation for performance was accomplished as required in accordance with ANGI 36-2001. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03610
This time enclosed was a NGB 22, stating that he was discharged with 5 years and 11 days of service and that he was eligible for reenlistment into the Armed Forces. After reviewing the applicants discharge notification package, dated 22 Mar 06, it was validated that the member was recommended for discharge for failing to maintain contact with the unit to schedule a date to attend BMT or attend Unit Training Assembly (UTA) weekends, which constituted substandard performance on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01044
His retired pay is based on 2,680 retirement points and over 33 years of service for basic pay in the grade of technical sergeant. The complete DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and provided copies of documents associated with the events cited in his appeal. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 01044
His retired pay is based on 2,680 retirement points and over 33 years of service for basic pay in the grade of technical sergeant. The complete DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and provided copies of documents associated with the events cited in his appeal. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02758
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served honorably for 2 years in the Air National Guard (ANG). The NGB/A1PS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 27 Aug 10 for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03451
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends his NGB Form 22 be changed to reflect a medical separation and denial of a change to the RE code. The complete NGB/A1PS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant/counsel on 18 Nov 11 for review and...